Impact of different parameters on the outcome of vv-ECMO therapy in burn patients – a retrospective cohort study from a burn and high output ECMO center
Author:
Bingoel Alperen S.12ORCID, Schlottmann Frederik1ORCID, Plinke Clarissa1, Dastagir Khaled1, Obed Doha1, Enechukwu Anieto1, Dieck Thorben1, Wellkamp Lukas1, Hanke Jasmin Sarah3, Kühn Christian3, Ruhparwar Arjang3, Krezdorn Nicco14, Vogt Peter M.1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Plastic, Aesthetic, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Burn Center , Hannover Medical School , Hannover , Germany 2. Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Trauma, Orthopedic and Plastic Surgery , 9177 University Medical Center Göttingen , Göttingen , Germany 3. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery , Hannover Medical School , Hannover , Germany 4. Department for Plastic and Breast Surgery , Sjaelland University Hospital , Roskilde , Denmark
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
The treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in burn patients remains a major challenge. Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vv-ECMO) is a standard treatment for severe ARDS today. But reports on survival outcome in burn patients remain variable in the literature. The aim of this study is to identify factors that may influence survival and therapy outcomes in this distinct patient population.
Methods
A single-center retrospective study was conducted in the burn intensive care unit (BICU). Inclusion criteria were the use of vv-ECMO for ARDS after burn injuries. The data analyzed included general medical data and various parameters from the BICU.
Results
Between January 2012 and December 2022, 21 consecutive adult patients were identified who underwent vv-ECMO treatment. Five patients (24 %) survived the therapy and could be discharged, and 16 patients (76 %) succumbed to their disease. A higher TBSA affected, lower pH in arterial blood gas analysis after 24 and 36 h, multiorgan dysfunction syndrome (MODS), renal insufficiency, and renal replacement therapy were significantly associated with a lethal outcome.
Conclusions
The data from the present study showed an overall mortality rate of 76 %, which is unsatisfactory compared to the literature. This could be explained by complicating factors such as MODS, renal failure, and renal replacement therapy. However, the indication for vv-ECMO must be adapted to the individual situation of the respective patient. Due to the additional higher risk for complications, the utilization of ECMO therapy should be reserved for specialized burn centers with an interdisciplinary setting.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference35 articles.
1. Guérin, C, Reignier, J, Richard, JC, Beuret, P, Gacouin, A, Boulain, T, et al.. Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2013;368:2159–68. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1214103. 2. Papazian, L, Forel, JM, Gacouin, A, Penot-Ragon, C, Perrin, G, Loundou, A, et al.. Neuromuscular blockers in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2010;363:1107–16. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1005372. 3. Bellani, G, Laffey, JG, Pham, T, Fan, E, Brochard, L, Esteban, A, et al.. Epidemiology, patterns of care, and mortality for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units in 50 countries. J Am Med Assoc 2016;315:788–800. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.0291. 4. Lam, NN, Hung, TD, Hung, DK. Acute respiratory distress syndrome among severe burn patients in a developing country: application result of the berlin definition. Ann Burns Fire Disasters 2018;31:9–12. 5. Silva, L, Garcia, L, Oliveira, B, Tanita, M, Festti, J, Cardoso, L, et al.. Acute respiratory distress syndrome in burn patients: incidence and risk factor analysis. Ann Burns Fire Disasters 2016;29:178–82.
|
|