The concentration of Lithium in water resources: A systematic review, meta-analysis and health risk assessment
Author:
Mahmudiono Trias1, Fakhri Yadolah2, Daraei Hasti34, Mehri Fereshteh5, Einolghozati Mahtab6, Mohamadi Sara7, Mousavi Khaneghah Amin89
Affiliation:
1. Department of Nutrition, Faculty of Public Health , Universitas Airlangga , Surabaya , Indonesia 2. Food Health Research Center , Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences , Bandar Abbas , Iran 3. Environmental Health Engineering Research Center , Kerman University of Medical Sciences , Kerman , Iran 4. Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Faculty of Public Health , Kerman University of Medical Sciences , Kerman , Iran 5. Nutrition Health Research Center , Hamadan University of Medical Sciences , Hamadan , Iran 6. Department of Nutrition and food Safety, School of Medicine. Nutrition Health Research Center , Hamadan University of Medical Sciences , Hamadan , Iran 7. Department of Food Hygiene and Quality Control, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine , Shahre-Kord University , Shahre-Kord , Iran 8. Department of Fruit and Vegetable Product Technology , Prof. Wacław Dąbrowski Institute of Agricultural and Food Biotechnology – State Research Institute , Warsaw , Poland 9. Department of Technology of Chemistry , Azerbaijan State Oil and Industry University , Baku , Azerbaijan
Abstract
Abstract
The presence of trace elements such as lithium (Li) in water resources in the long term can endanger consumers’ health. Several studies have been conducted on Li concentration in water sources; hence, this study attempted to retrieve studies using a systematic search. The search was conducted in Web of Sciences, Embase, PubMed, and Scopus databases from 1 January 2010 to 15 January 2023. Li concentration was meta-analyzed based on the type of water resources and countries subgroups in the random effects model (REM) statistical analysis. In addition, health risk assessment in different age groups was calculated using the target hazard quotient (THQ). This study included 76 papers with 157 data reports in our meta-analysis. The overall pooled concentration of Li was 5.374 (95 % CI: 5.261–5.487 μg/L). The pooled concentration of Li in groundwater (40.407 μg/L) was 14.53 times surface water (2.785 μg/L). The highest water Li content was attributed to Mexico (2,209.05 μg/L), Bolivia (1,444.05 μg/L), Iraq (1,350 μg/L), and Argentina (516.39 μg/L). At the same time, the lowest water Li content was associated with Morocco (1.20 μg/L), Spain (0.46 μg/L), and India (0.13 μg/L). THQ due to Li in water resources in consumers of Iraq, Mexico, South Africa, Afghanistan, Bolivia, Portugal, Malawi, South Korea, Nepal, South Korea, Argentina, and the USA was higher than 1 value. Therefore, continuous monitoring of Li concentration in water sources and reducing Li concentration, especially in groundwater water, using new water treatment processes in these countries are recommended.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Pollution,Health (social science)
Reference89 articles.
1. Han, Y, Wang, H, Wu, J, Hu, Y, Wen, H, Yang, Z, et al.. Hydrogen peroxide treatment mitigates antibiotic resistance gene and mobile genetic element propagation in mariculture sediment. Environ Pollut 2023;328:121652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121652. 2. Yang, Y, Shi, Y, Chen, D, Chen, H, Liu, X. Bisphenol A and its analogues in paired urine and house dust from South China and implications for children’s exposure. Chemosphere 2022;294:133701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133701. 3. Chen, Z, Lin, B, Huang, Y, Liu, Y, Wu, Y, Qu, R, et al.. Pyrolysis temperature affects the physiochemical characteristics of lanthanum-modified biochar derived from orange peels: insights into the mechanisms of tetracycline adsorption by spectroscopic analysis and theoretical calculations. Sci Total Environ 2023;862:160860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160860. 4. Tian, Y, Yang, Z, Yu, X, Jia, Z, Rosso, M, Dedman, S, et al.. Can we quantify the aquatic environmental plastic load from aquaculture? Water Res 2022;219:118551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2022.118551. 5. Guo, B, Wang, Y, Feng, Y, Liang, C, Tang, L, Yao, X, et al.. The effects of environmental tax reform on urban air pollution: a quasi-natural experiment based on the Environmental Protection Tax Law. Front Public Health 2022;10:967524. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.967524.
|
|