World-switch and mind style in The Barracks: a cognitive approach to ideology

Author:

Alarcón-Hermosilla Salvador1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Philology , University of Almería , Almería , Spain

Abstract

Abstract The aim of this paper is to take a close look at John McGahern’s mind style through the language of the heroine Elizabeth Reegan and other characters, in his 1963 novel The Barracks. Specifically, attention will be drawn to how the linguistic choices shape the figurative language to cast the author’s controversial views on the religion-pervaded puritan Irish society that he knew so well. This will be done from two different perspectives. One perspective is through the breast cancer afflicted heroine, who asserts herself as a free thinker and a woman of science, in a society where priests have a strong influence at all social levels, and most women settle for housekeeping. The other is also through Elizabeth, together with other minor characters, who dare question some of the basic well-established ideological assumptions, in a series of examples where the author skilfully raises two parallel dichotomies, namely, FAITH versus REASON, and DARKNESS versus LIGHT. At a linguistic level, the present analysis relies on precepts from Frame Semantics, Conceptual Metaphor Theory, and Cognitive Grammar. These insights prove a most useful method of approach to a narrative text while unearthing the author’s ideological world view.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Literature and Literary Theory,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics

Reference28 articles.

1. Barton, David. 2007. Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

2. Carney, James. 2017. The space between your ears. Construal level theory, cognitive science and science fiction. In Michael Burke & Emily T. Troscianko (eds.), Cognitive literary science, 73–92. New York: Oxford University Press.

3. Dancygier, Barbara & Eve Sweetser. 2005. Mental spaces in grammar: Conditional constructions, 43–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

4. Dancygier, Barbara & Lieven Vandelanotte. 2009. Judging distances: Mental spaces, distance, and viewpoint in literary discourse. In Geert Brône & Jeroen Vandaele (eds.), Cognitive poetics. Goals, gains and gaps, 319–369. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.

5. Deignan, Alice, Jeannette Littlemore & Semino Elena. 2013. Figurative language, genre and register, 10–22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The year’s work in stylistics 2021;Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics;2022-11

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3