Affiliation:
1. University of Vienna, Wien, 1010, Austria
Abstract
AbstractThis article employs artifacts from the KMB’s “material culture” as a lens into this institution’s branding process and, within it, its interaction with the Venice Biennale. It analyzes larger questions about the career of the biennale cultural form as it re-territorializes in a new location that is added to the art world map “in progress.” Historically, geographical location has been crucial for many biennales in the Global South to articulate their origin, identity, and claims vis-à-vis the global art world. Moreover, biennale proliferation especially in the South has produced cartographic re-imaginings aiming to destabilize the “center-periphery” configuration of the art world map. The article shows that the KMB does not reiterate ideological standings put forward by Southern biennales but crafts its positionality on different grounds. These entail simultaneously anchoring the KMB to histories of circulation in and out of South India tracing back at least two millennia and strategically weaving a relation with the archetypical Venice Biennale in the present.
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Social Sciences
Reference86 articles.
1. The Kochi-Muziris Biennale;Third Text,2013
2. Maps, Mapping, Modernity: Art and Cartography in the Twentieth Century;Imago Mundi,2005
3. The Politics of Spectacle: The Gwangju Biennale and the Asian Century;Invisible Culture,2008