Pension provision by small employers in Ireland: an analysis of Personal Retirement Savings Account (PRSA) using bounded rationality theory

Author:

Maloney Maureen1,McCarthy Alma1

Affiliation:

1. Discipline of Management, J.E. Cairnes School of Business & Economics , National University of Ireland , Galway , Ireland

Abstract

Abstract This paper applies a model of bounded rationality to study small employers’ decision-making on pension provision in Ireland. Personal Retirement Savings Account (PRSA) pension products were intended to provide inexpensive, flexible pension options, particularly targeted towards small enterprises. After 10 years of their introduction, evidence suggests that the PRSA pension product has little impact on pension coverage in Ireland and the employees of small organisations are least likely to be the members of pension schemes. Drawing on the theory of bounded rationality and a review of the legislative and institutional context within which small employers in Ireland make decisions on pension provision, this paper presents a pension decision-making model of small employers based on the work of Simon (1983). A range of propositions are set out for empirical research to examine pension provision practices of small employers relating to whether they have a tendency to organise rather than sponsor PRSAs for their employees. The implications for theory, research and policy are explained.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference84 articles.

1. Arrowsmith, J., Gilman, M., Edwards, P. and Ram, M. (2003). ‘The impact of the national minimum wage in small firms’. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 41: 3, 435-456.10.1111/1467-8543.00281

2. Aviva. (2017a). Types of Pensions: PRSAs. http://www.aviva.ie/lifeandpensions/pensions/typesofpensions/prsa/ [Accessed 6 December 2017].

3. Aviva. (2017b). Your Investment Options. http://www.aviva.ie/media-library/21.38.03.17-Your-Investment-Options.pdf [Accessed 6 December 2017].

4. Aviva. (2014). An Employer’s Guide to PRSAs. Dublin: Aviva.

5. Barr, N. and Diamond, P. (2009). ‘Reforming pensions: Principles, analytical errors and policy directions’. International Social Security Review, 62: 2, 5-29.10.1111/j.1468-246X.2009.01327.x

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3