Affiliation:
1. University of Kansas School of Law , 1535 W. 15 St , Lawrence , KS 66045 , USA
Abstract
Abstract
Non-financial reporting reforms have moved ahead around the world as governments work to advance sustainable development and improve environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) risk management by firms and investors In the United States, however, non-financial reporting reforms face resistance and have lagged behind. This article offers an overview of the state of non-financial reporting in the U.S. and explains why the U.S. approach still diverges so visibly from the reform path adopted by other governments around the world. It then suggests potential directions for non-financial disclosure reform that take account of the U.S. institutional context. The article concludes by considering the implications of the United States’ market-driven approach for non-financial reporting reform and for the future of sustainable finance more broadly.
Subject
Law,Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Accounting
Reference93 articles.
1. Allen, H. (2018). The SEC as financial stability regulator. Journal of Corporation Law, 43, 715–774.
2. Bainbridge, S. (2003). Director primacy. Northwestern University Law Review, 97, 547–606.
3. Barker, R., & Eccles, R. (2018), Should FASB and IASB be responsible for setting standards for nonfinancial information? Green Paper. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3272250
4. Bauer, R., Moers, F., & Viehs, M. (2015). Who withdraws shareholder proposals and does it matter? An analysis of sponsor identity and pay practices. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(6), 472–488. Available at http://doi:10.1111/corg.12109
5. Brummer, C. (2010). Post-American securities regulation. California Law Review, 98, 327–383.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献