Affiliation:
1. Section of Theoretical Physics, Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS , Grenoble INP, 3SR , F-38000 Grenoble , France
Abstract
Abstract
The existing models of the interstellar radiation field (ISRF) do not produce a Maxwell field. Here, the recent model of the ISRF as a Maxwell field is improved by considering separately the different frequencies at the stage of the fitting. Using this improved procedure: (i) It is checked in detail that the model does predict extremely high values of the spectral energy density (SED) on the axis of a galaxy, which however decreases very rapidly when
ρ
\rho
, the distance to the axis, is increased from zero. (ii) The difference between the SED values (with
ρ
=
1
\rho =1
or
8
kpc
8\hspace{0.33em}{\rm{kpc}}
), as predicted either by this model or by a recent radiation transfer model, is reduced significantly. (iii) The slower decrease of the SED with increasing altitude
z
z
, as compared with the radiation transfer model, is confirmed. We also calculate the evolutions of the SED at large
ρ
\rho
. We interpret these evolutions by determining asymptotic expansions of the SED at large
z
z
, and also ones at large
ρ
\rho
.
Subject
General Physics and Astronomy
Reference22 articles.
1. Chi X, Wolfendale AW. The interstellar radiation field: a datum for cosmic ray physics. J Phys C Nucl Part Phys. 1991;17:987–98.
2. Mathis JS, Mezger PG, Panagia N. Interstellar radiation field and dust temperatures in the diffuse interstellar matter and in giant molecular clouds. Astron Astrophys. 1983;128:212–29.
3. Gordon KD, Misselt KA, Witt AN, Clayton GC. The DIRTY model. I. Monte Carlo radiative transfer through dust. Astrophys J. 2001;551:269–76.
4. Robitaille TP. HYPERION: an open-source parallelized three-dimensional dust continuum radiative transfer code. Astron Astrophys. 2011;536:A79, 17 pages.
5. Popescu CC, Yang R, Tuffs RJ, Natale G, Rushton M, Aharonian F. A radiation transfer model for the Milky Way: I. Radiation fields and application to high energy astrophysics. Mon Not Roy Astr Soc. 2017;470(3):2539–58.