Affiliation:
1. Department of Archaeology , 52948 Bilkent University , Bilkent University Main Campus, FHL Building Room H143, Çankaya , Ankara , Ankara , Türkiye
Abstract
Abstract
Crisis and collapse have long been prominent themes in Hittite studies (much more so than the related topics of resistance and resilience) and most of the extant body of scholarship on these themes have concentrated on the disintegration of the Hittite Empire around 1200 BCE. Though the events, conditions and processes that culminated in the disintegration of the Hittite Empire elude historical reconstruction, recent studies have unanimously rejected monocausal explanations of collapse in favor of the view that it was brought about by a combination of factors – internal, external, acute or chronic. In Hittite scholarship, the study of collapse and its aftermath have typically operated within a markedly state-centered and progressivist framework, focusing primarily on figuring out “what went wrong.” Meanwhile, especially in text-based studies, the agency and resilience of local, small(er)-scale, peripheral, and non-state individuals and communities, as well as their role in the construction, maintenance, and collapse of the Hittite empire, remain largely overlooked. The aim of the present paper is to shift the focus and scale of analysis away from the state, and to draw out from the textual record, the long-term agency, resistance, and resilience of local, small-scale, and often non-state individuals, communities, or socio-political institutions, which have typically been left out of text-based modern narratives. This paper will reassess the prominent view of the Hittite king (and state) as the absolute political, military, judicial, and religious authority, and argue that certain local and non-state communities and socio-political institutions exercised diverse kinds of agency, were remarkably resilient in the long term, and survived the final collapse of the Hittite state. In order to situate the inquiry in its broader scholarly and intellectual context, it will begin with an overview of where things stand in the study of the Hittite collapse. The next step will be to identify individual or collective local actors in the textual record. It will lastly focus on the interactions of diverse local agents with the Hittite state.
Reference65 articles.
1. Adas, Michael. 1981. “From Avoidance to Confrontation: Peasant Protest in Precolonial and Colonial Southeast Asia.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 23: 217–47. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429461309-1.
2. Alaura, Silvia. (2020). “The Much-Fabled End of the Hittite Empire: Tracing the History of a Crucial Topic.” In Anatolia Between the 13th and the 12th Century BCE (Eothen 23), edited by Stefano, de Martino, and Elena, Devecchi, 9–30. Florence: LoGisma editore.
3. Alp, Sedat. 1991. Hethitische Briefe aus Maşat Höyük. Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu Basımevi.
4. Beckman, Gary M. (1995). Atti del II Congresso Internazionale di Hittitologia, edited by Onofrio, Carruba, Mauro, Giorgieri, and Clelia, Mora. Pavia: Gianni Iuculano Editore.
5. Beckman, Gary M. 1999a. Hittite Diplomatic Texts, 2nd ed. Atlanta: Scholars Press.