Affiliation:
1. Department of English Language/Translation, Isra University , Amman , Jordan
2. Independent Researcher , Amman , Jordan
Abstract
Abstract
The present study examines the role of context in understanding colloquial Arabic idiomatic expressions by Jordanian good and poor comprehenders in two age groups: 10- and 12-year-olds. Children read short stories comprising Arabic expressions that could be interpreted as idiomatic or not; depending on the context in which they are presented. Familiar and unfamiliar idiomatic expressions were used in this study. The effect of four variables: age, reading comprehension level, meaning condition as well as familiarity with the idiomatic expressions on children’s understanding of idiomatic expressions was examined. Three variables were found to have a main effect on the number of correct answers given by children, these are: meaning condition, reading comprehension level, and familiarity of the idiom. Children gave more correct answers in the transparent meaning condition. More correct answers were given for familiar idiomatic expressions. Also, good comprehenders gave more correct answers than their poor counterparts. On the basis of age, the differences between the groups were not significant.
Reference20 articles.
1. Ackerman, P. B. (1982). On comprehending idioms: Do children get the picture? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 33(3), 439–454.
2. Alghazo, S., Alrashdan, I., Nour Al Salem, M., & Salem, E. (2022). Idioms as pragmatic messages. Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences, 49(4), 425–442. doi: 10.35516/hum.v49i4.2092.
3. Awwad, M. (1990). Equivalence and translability of English and Arabic idioms. Papers and Studies in Contrastive Linguistics, 26, 57–67.
4. Burman, D. D., Bitan, T., & Booth, J. R. (2008). Sex differences in neural processing of language among children. Neuropsychologia, 46(5), 1349–1362.
5. Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Lemmon, K. (2005). The relation between children’s reading comprehension level and their comprehension of idioms. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 90(1), 65–87.