Affiliation:
1. Department of Communication Science and Center for Culture and Frontier Studies, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang , East Java 65153 , Indonesia
2. Department of Sociology and Center for Culture and Frontier Studies, Universitas Brawijaya , Malang , East Java, 65144 , Indonesia
Abstract
Abstract
The study of colonialism and its legacies have mostly left the category of memory studies. However, for the colonised subject, what they experienced in the past inevitably forms their present and future discourse. This study focuses on how the museum’s visual order articulates colonial memory. By looking at the work of representation, in this context museum’s visual order, this study investigates how memory lives on through the circulation of colonial memory that the museum simulates. Museum’s visual order translates how colonial memory should be remembered and celebrated as public knowledge. Although research on how museums affect society knowledge have been part of both memory and museum studies, those two studies barely touch upon museums’ role in translating colonial memory in the postcolonial nation. Memory lives on through its circulation in media forms. However, premeditation and mediation are made possible through articulating social and cultural sites, in this case, museums practice. In order to achieve its purposes, this research investigates public museums in different parts of Java, Indonesia which have colonial memory objects. The combination of field observation, document review, and visual method followed by focus group discussion between stakeholders and researchers are conducted to propose the research conclusion. This research argues that the museum’s visual order translates interrelated colonial memories to be accepted as a part of the history that forms the “existence” of the nation and to be appreciated as public knowledge that is shared and forms the national identity. In doing so, museum practice roams into the area of political visibility which decides the legibility of the narrative related to colonial memory. In addition, as museum practice is basically a colonial legacy, this research concludes that it is essential to deconstruct the practice from the perspective of the colonised.
Subject
General Social Sciences,General Arts and Humanities
Reference39 articles.
1. Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Antionalism. Verso, 2006.
2. Arainikasih, Ajeng Ayu, and Hafnidar. “Decolonising the Aceh Museum: Objects, Histories and Their Narratives.” BMGN – Low Countries Historical Review, vol. 133, no. 2, 2018, pp. 104–119. doi: 10.18352/bmgn-lchr.10554.
3. Ariese, Csilla E. “Decolonizing the Amsterdam Museum: A Work-in-Progress to Becoming a More Inclusive City Museum.” Eur, 2019. https://projectechoes.eu/wp-content/uploads/Ariese-Amsterdam-Museum-Report-2_compressed.pdf.
4. Barringer, Tim, and Tom Flynn, editors. Colonialism and the Object: Empire, Material Culture and the Museum. Routledge, 1998.
5. Bennett, Tony, Fiona Cameron, et al. Collecting, Ordering, Governing: Anthropology, Museums, and Liberal Government. Duke University Press, 2017.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献