Pain perception during colonoscopy in relation to gender and equipment: a clinical study
Author:
Hendel Kristoffer1ORCID, Hendel Rebecca1, Hendel Jakob1, Hendel Lene1
Affiliation:
1. Medical Gastroenterology , Rolighedsvej 47 , Birkerød , Denmark
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
A trend for gender-related differences in pain perception during colonoscopies has previously been observed. No consecutive clinical studies have been conducted to confirm such a relation. We aimed to investigate gender-related differences during the colonoscopy procedure, and the impact of endoscopic equipment and psychological factors on pain management.
Methods
In a consecutive clinical study, 391 patients referred for colonoscopy reported pain perception on a 0–10 visual analogue scale (VAS) after the procedure. A sub-group of patients (n=38) were given alternate instructions expertly tailored by a psychologist and their VAS scores were compared with those from the main study population. Data from a previous study from the same specialist practice and same source patient population using previous-generation equipment was included for comparison.
Results
No overall gender-related difference in VAS reports was found. There was no reduction in VAS when alternate instructions were given. Female patients were, however, more likely to benefit from light sedation (p=0.012). When compared with previous-generation endoscopes, the current generation equipment resulted in a VAS drop of 1.9 points for women and 1.6 for men (p<0.009) and washed out a previously observed gender-related difference.
Conclusion
No overall gender-related differences were found for pain experience during the colonoscopy procedure. Access to up-to-date endoscopic equipment can reduce procedure-related patient discomfort considerably, even at the expert level of a consultant physician.
Implications
Gastroenterologists should consider utilizing high-end endoscopic equipment to improve pain management and reduce VAS to very acceptable levels.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Neurology (clinical)
Reference20 articles.
1. Bak-Christensen, A, Knudsen, E, Hendel, J, Ifaoui, IBR, Lehrskov-Schmidt, L, Hendel, L. Colonoscopy results are not enhanced by use of magnet endoguide in specialist practice. Dan Med J 2013;60:A4611. 2. Chung, YW, Han, DS, Yoo, KS, Park, CK. Patient factors predictive of pain and difficulty during sedation-free colonoscopy: a prospective study in Korea. Dig Liver Dis 2007;39:872–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2007.04.019. 3. Preisler, L, Bulut, M, Svendsen, MS, Svendsen, LB, Konge, L. An automatic measure of progression during colonoscopy correlates to patient experienced pain. Scand J Gastroenterol 2018;53:345–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2017.1423373. 4. Barclay, RL, Vicari, JJ, Doughty, AS, Johanson, JF, Greenlaw, RL. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2533–41. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa055498. 5. Jung, Y, Joo, Y-E, Kim, HG, Jeon, SR, Cha, JM, Yang, H-J, et al, Relationship between the endoscopic withdrawal time and adenoma/polyp detection rate in individual colonic segments: a KASID multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2019;89:523–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2018.09.016.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|