Noninvasive transcranial brain stimulation in central post-stroke pain: A systematic review

Author:

Mayor Rita Sotto1ORCID,Ferreira Natália R.2ORCID,Lanzaro Camile3ORCID,Castelo-Branco Miguel4ORCID,Valentim Ana1ORCID,Donato Helena5ORCID,Lapa Teresa16ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Anesthesiology Department, Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra , Praceta Prof. Mota Pinto, 3000-075 , Coimbra , Portugal

2. Institute of Occlusion and Orofacial Pain, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra , Coimbra , Portugal

3. Anesthesiology Department, Local Unit of Health in Alto Minho , Viana do Castelo , Portugal

4. Coimbra Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Translational Research (CIBIT), University of Coimbra , Coimbra , Portugal

5. Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra , Coimbra , Portugal

6. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior , Covilhã , Portugal

Abstract

Abstract Background The aim of this systematic review is to analyze the efficacy of noninvasive brain stimulation (NBS) in the treatment of central post-stroke pain (CPSP). Methods We included randomized controlled trials testing the efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) or transcranial direct current stimulation versus placebo or other usual therapy in patients with CPSP. Articles in English, Portuguese, Spanish, Italian, and French were included. A bibliographic search was independently conducted on June 1, 2022, by two authors, using the databases MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (Elsevier), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection. The risk of bias was assessed using the second version of the Cochrane risk of bias (RoB 2) tool and the certainty of the evidence was evaluated through Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Results A total of 2,674 records were identified after removing duplicates, of which 5 eligible studies were included, involving a total of 119 patients. All five studies evaluated repetitive TMS, four of which stimulated the primary motor cortex (M1) and one stimulated the premotor/dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Only the former one reported a significant pain reduction in the short term, while the latter one was interrupted due to a consistent lack of analgesic effect. Conclusion NBS in the M1 area seems to be effective in reducing short-term pain; however, more high-quality homogeneous studies, with long-term follow-up, are required to determine the efficacy of this treatment in CSPS.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3