Intervention with an educational video after a whiplash trauma – a randomised controlled clinical trial
Author:
Rydman Eric12, Ottosson Carin2, Ponzer Sari2, Dahl Anna2, Eneqvist Ted2, Järnbert-Pettersson Hans2, Kasina Piotr2
Affiliation:
1. Department of Orthopedics , Södersjukhuset , SE-118 83 Stockholm , Sweden 2. Department of Clinical Science and Education , Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden
Abstract
Abstract
Background and aims
Previous systematic reviews have considered that providing patient information is ineffective for patients with whiplash-associated disorders (WAD), with the exception of interventional educational videos. The aim of this randomised controlled clinical trial was to determine if use of an educational video as an intervention in the acute stage after a whiplash injury might improve self-reported recovery at 6 months after the injury.
Methods
In total, 289 consecutive patients with a whiplash injury following a motor vehicle collision were randomised to an intervention group (educational video) or to a control group (written information sheet). The video focused on information about pain mechanisms, deep flexor physiotherapy and reassurance. Emailed questionnaires were used to collect baseline data within 2 weeks after the accident and then to collect outcome data at 6 months post-injury. Non-responders were followed up with a brief telephone interview regarding the outcome. The primary outcome measure was self-reported recovery (yes/no) at 6 months post-injury. The secondary outcomes measures were pain level according to a numeric rating scale (NRS) and the whiplash disability questionnaire (WDQ) score at the same time point.
Results
The response rate for the baseline questionnaire was 70% (203/289). The follow-up rate was 97% (196/203). The non-recovery rates were similar between the intervention group, at 37.9% (39/103), and the control group, at 33.3% (31/93) (p = 0.55). No differences between the groups were noted in pain levels, NRS scores (1.9 vs. 2.2, p = 0.35) or the mean WDQ scores (17.5 vs. 21.2, p = 0.42).
Conclusions
The intervention with the educational video used in this study had no effect on the non-recovery rate when compared to a basic written information sheet.
Implications
The results of this trial add knowledge to the area of patient education for patients with acute WAD. Further studies are needed before the current recommendations for patient information are modified.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Clinical Neurology
Reference34 articles.
1. Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Lozano R, Michaud C, Ezzati M, Shibuya K, Salomon JA, Abdalla S, Aboyans V, Abraham J, Ackerman I, Aggarwal R, Ahn SY, Ali MK, Alvardo M, Anderson HR, Anderson LM, Andrews KG, Atkinson C, et al. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012;380:2163–96. 2. Trafikverket, Information to patients, 2013. Available at: https://www.trafikverket.se/resa-och-trafik/Trafiksakerhet/Din-sakerhet-pa-vagen/Sakerhet-i-bil/Krocksakerhet/Pisksnart---whiplash/. 3. Styrke J, Stalnacke BM, Bylund PO, Sojka P, Bjornstig U. A 10-year incidence of acute whiplash injuries after road traffic crashes in a defined population in northern Sweden. PM R 2012;4:739–47. 4. Partheni M, Constantoyannis C, Ferrari R, Nikiforidis G, Voulgaris S, Papadakis N. A prospective cohort study of the outcome of acute whiplash injury in Greece. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2000;18:67–70. 5. Kyhlback M, Thierfelder T, Soderlund A. Prognostic factors in whiplash-associated disorders. Int J Rehabil Res 2002;25:181–7.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|