Skin conductance algesimeter is unreliable during sudden perioperative temperature increases

Author:

Kongsgaard Ulf E.12,Menchini Robin Johansen1,Larsen Stein Gunnar3,Juul-Hansen Knut Erling1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anaesthesia, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital , Oslo , Norway

2. Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo , Oslo , Norway

3. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital , Oslo , Norway

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Pain assessment in anesthetized and non-communicative patients remains a challenge. Clinical signs such as tachycardia, hypertension, sweat and tears, have a low specificity for pain and should therefore ideally be replaced by more specific monitoring techniques. Skin conductance variability has been demonstrated to establish a patients’ sensitivity to pain, but may be influenced by temperature changes that leads to profuse sweating. The aim of this pilot study was to test skin conductance changes during sudden temperature changes due to hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) perfusation. Methods We investigated skin conductance algesimeter (SCA) in ten consecutive patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC. Results from the SCA was compared to other standard physiological variables at seven time points during the surgical procedure, in particular during the period with hyperthermic intraabdominal perfusion leading to an increase in the patients core temperature. Results Nine out of ten patients had an increase in the SCA measurements during the HIPEC phase correlating the increase in temperature. Conclusion SCA is unreliable to detect increased pain sensation during sudden perioperative temperature changes in adult patients.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference26 articles.

1. Banerjee S, MacDougall D. CADTH rapid response reports, in nociception monitoring for general anesthesia: A review of clinical effectiveness, Cost-effectiveness, and guidelines. 2018, Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health Health Nociception Monitoring for General Anesthesia. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30855764/. Assessed 25 September 2023.

2. Bard JW. The BIS monitor: a review and technology assessment. AANA J. 2001;69(6):477–83.

3. De Cosmo G, Aceto P, Clemente A, Congedo E. Auditory evoked potentials. Minerva Anestesiol. 2004;70(5):293–7.

4. Shepherd J, Jones J, Frampton G, Bryant J, Baxter L, Cooper K. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of depth of anaesthesia monitoring (E-entropy, bispectral index and narcotrend): a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2013;17(34):1–264.

5. Roche D, Mahon P. Depth of anesthesia monitoring. Anesthesiol Clin. 2021;39(3):477–92.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3