Importance of blinding and expectations in opioid-induced constipation: evidence from a randomized controlled trial
Author:
Sieg Mette1, Mark Esben Bolvig2, Drewes Asbjørn Mohr23, Vase Lene1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences , Aarhus University , Aarhus , Denmark 2. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology , Mech-Sense, Aalborg University Hospital , Aalborg , Denmark 3. Department of Clinical Medicine , Aalborg University , Aalborg , Denmark
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Previous studies have found little association between objective measures and the subjective experience of opioid-induced constipation. The subjective experience of opioid-induced constipation may be influenced by treatment expectations. While most trials control for treatment expectations through blinding, success rate is generally low. This study aimed to explore the association between objective measures and the subjective experience of opioid-induced constipation, while considering blinding success and treatment expectations, and other psychological factors.
Methods
Data from a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled crossover trial including 21 healthy male participants was analyzed. Participants received either placebo, tapentadol, or oxycodone (in equipotent doses) for 14 days. They were assessed on objective and subjective measures of opioid-induced constipation (gastrointestinal transit time and the Patient Assessment of Constipation-Symptoms questionnaire, respectively), treatment guesses to indicate blinding success, and psychological factors.
Results
There was a strong association between objective and subjective measures of opioid-induced constipation when participants were treated with oxycodone (r=0.676, p=0.006). Furthermore, participants were able to guess that they received active treatment when treated with oxycodone (p<0.001), suggesting that treatment expectations may have influenced the subjective experience of symptoms. Finally, patterns of moderate associations between opioid-induced constipation and other psychological factors emerged, although none reached significance (p>0.05).
Conclusions
Results indicate that treatment expectations could play an important role in the subjective experience of opioid-induced constipation, and support the importance of assessing blinding success in study trials. Besides expectations, other psychological factors may be associated with opioid-induced constipation.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Neurology (clinical)
Reference27 articles.
1. Farmer, AD, Drewes, AM, Chiarioni, G, De Giorgio, R, O’Brien, T, Morlion, B, et al.. Pathophysiology and management of opioid-induced constipation: European expert consensus statement. United European Gastroenterol J 2019;7:7–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050640618818305. 2. Benyamin, R, Trescot, AM, Datta, S, Buenaventura, R, Adlaka, R, Sehgal, N, et al.. Opioid complications and side effects. Pain Physician 2008;11:S105–20. https://doi.org/10.36076/ppj.2008/11/s105. 3. Cowlam, S, Vinayagam, R, Khan, U, Marsden, S, Minty, I, Moncur, P, et al.. Blinded comparison of faecal loading on plain radiography versus radio-opaque marker transit studies in the assessment of constipation. Clin Radiol 2008;63:1326–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2008.06.011. 4. Grotz, RL, Pemberton, JH, Talley, NJ, Rath, DM, Zinsmeister, AR. Discriminant value of psychological distress, symptom profiles, and segmental colonic dysfunction in outpatients with severe idiopathic constipation. Gut 1994;35:798–802. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.35.6.798. 5. Knudsen, K, Krogh, K, Østergaard, K, Borghammer, P. Constipation in Parkinson’s disease: subjective symptoms, objective markers, and new perspectives. Mov Disord 2017;32:94–105. https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.26866.
|
|