Discriminant properties of the Behavioral Pain Scale for assessment of procedural pain-related distress in ventilated children

Author:

Mauritz Maximilian David12,Uhlenberg Felix3,Dreier Larissa Alice4,Giordano Vito5,Deindl Philipp2

Affiliation:

1. German Paediatric Pain Centre , Children’s and Adolescents’ Hospital, Witten/Herdecke University , Datteln , Germany

2. Department of Neonatology and Pediatric Intensive Care Medicine , University Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf , Hamburg , Germany

3. Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine , Neonatology and Pediatric Intensive Care Medicine, Itzehoe Medical Center , Itzehoe , Germany

4. PedScience Research Institute , Datteln , Germany

5. Division of Neonatology, Pediatric Intensive Care, and Neuropediatrics, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine , Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Children hospitalized in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) are frequently exposed to distressing and painful medical procedures and interventions. There is a lack of clinical scales to measure procedural pain-related distress in ventilated children. The Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS) was initially developed to detect procedural pain in critically ill adults. This study aims to assess the BPS’s discriminant properties for measuring procedural pain-related distress in ventilated pediatric patients incorporating two instruments validated for pediatric patients. Methods This prospective exploratory study was performed with ventilated children admitted to the interdisciplinary 14-bed PICU of the University Children’s Hospital, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany. The nurse in charge and an independent observer simultaneously assessed the patients using German versions of the BPS, the COMFORT-B scale (CBS), and the modified Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (mFLACC) scale immediately before and during endotracheal suctioning. Results We analyzed 170 parallel assessments in n=34 ventilated children. Patients were (mean ± SD) 9.5 ± 4.8 years old. Internal consistency for the BPS was excellent (α=0.93). We found a high rater agreement for all clinical scales (BPS: k=0.73, CBS: k=0.80, mFLACC: k=0.71). Strong correlations were identified between BPS and CBS (r=0.89) and BPS and mFLACC (r=0.79). The BPS cutoff values showed likewise excellent results (area under the curve CBS >16: 0.97; mFLACC >2: 0.91). Conclusions In our population of ventilated children, the BPS was well suited to detect procedural pain-related distress compared with two validated pain scales. Further extensive validation studies should follow to support our findings.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Neurology (clinical)

Reference61 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3