Affiliation:
1. Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences , Aarhus University , Bartholins Allé 11, Building 1350 , DK-8000 Aarhus C , Denmark
Abstract
Abstract
Background and aims
The randomized controlled trial (RCT) is currently facing several challenges, one of these being that the placebo response appears to be increasing in RCTs, thereby making it difficult to demonstrate an effect of potentially new treatments over placebo. This problem has primarily been approached by predicting the magnitude of the placebo response via stable factors, such as demographic variables, and/or by developing complex designs aimed at reducing the placebo response in the hope that it will improve the test of the active treatment. Yet, the success of this approach has so far been limited.
Methods
A new approach toward improving the RCT is put forward based on placebo and nocebo mechanism studies, i.e. studies that investigate the mechanisms underlying placebo analgesia and nocebo hyperalgesia. In a series of meta-analyses the magnitude of placebo and nocebo effects were determined. Experimental studies across nociplastic and neuropathic pain conditions and across pharmacological and acupuncture treatments investigated psychological and neurobiological mechanisms underlying these effects. The obtained results were used to make approximations of expectations to see if that could predict the placebo response in RCTs and function as a new way of tapping into the placebo component of treatment effects.
Results
The magnitude of placebo and nocebo effects is large and highly variable. Placebo effects exist across chronic pain conditions with varying degrees of known etiology as well as across pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments. Patients’ perception of the treatment, the verbal suggestions given for pain relief, and the patients’ expectations toward pain relief contribute to the magnitude of the placebo effect and to pain relief following placebo interventions. Also, unintentional unblinding and patients’ perception of a treatment markedly influence the treatment outcome. By making approximations of expectations toward treatment effects it was possible to predict the magnitude of the placebo response in RCTs.
Conclusions and implications
The new approach of tapping into or directly asking patients about their perception and expectations toward a treatment, along with the account of the natural history of pain, has the potential to improve the information that can be obtained from RCTs. Thus, by interfacing insights from placebo and nocebo mechanism studies, it may be possible to enhance the information that can be obtained from RCTs and to account for a large part of the variability in the placebo component of the overall treatment effect. This approach has the potential to improve the scientific evaluation of treatments, as well as to illustrate how the effect of treatments can be optimized in clinical practice, which is the crux of evidence-based medicine.
Subject
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Neurology (clinical)
Reference147 articles.
1. Finniss D. Historical aspects of placebo analgesia. In: Colloca L, Flaten MA, Meissner K, editors. Placebo and Pain. From Bench to Bedside. London: Elsevier, 2013:1–8.
2. Harrington A. Introduction. In: Harrington A, editor. The Placebo Effect. An Interdisciplinary Exploration. Cambridge: Boston University Press, 1997a.
3. Shapiro A. A history and heuristic definition of the placebo. Psychiatry 1964;27:52–8.
4. Ekeland TJ. Meining som medisin: ein analyse av placebofenomenet og implikasjoner for terapi og terapeutiske teoriar. Bergen, NO: Institut for Samfunnspsykologi, Psykologisk Fakultet, Universitetet i Bergen, 1999.
5. Shapiro AK, Morris LA. The placebo effect in medical and psychological therapies. In: Garfield SL, Bergin AE, editors. Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behaviour Change: An Empirical Analysis. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley, 1978:369–409.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献