Validation of the Danish version of the knowledge and attitudes survey regarding pain

Author:

Jørgensen Jacob Brauner1,Clement Sanne Lund2

Affiliation:

1. Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet , Valdemar Hansens Vej 1-23, 2600 Glostrup , Denmark

2. Institut for Politik og Samfund, Aalborg University , Fibigerstræde 1, 57, 9220 Aalborg Ø , Denmark

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Pain management is critical for nurses; therefore, knowledge assessment is also critical. The Knowledge and Attitudes Survey Regarding Pain (KASRP), designed for testing pain management knowledge among nurses, finds widespread use internationally; yet, key validity evidence according to American Psychological Association standards is missing. Therefore, this study aimed to translate and test the psychometric traits of KASRP based on an item response theory model. Methods Cronbach’s α was included to assess internal consistency, and the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was included to assess the total score normal distribution goodness of fit. KASRP was tested using the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) test for sphericity to examine its suitability for factor analysis and exploratory factor analysis to examine construct evidence. The Kruskal–Wallis H test was used to assess discriminant evidence. The correlation between KASRP and the Brockopp–Warden Pain Knowledge Questionnaire (BWPKQ) was included as a measure of convergent validity evidence, and correlation with self-assessed knowledge was tested as a divergent validity measure. Results The questionnaire was translated using back-forth and parallel translation. The KMO test for sphericity was 0.49 for all items and 0.53 for the adjusted scale without items 30, 33, and 36, with factor analysis explaining 70.42% of the variation suggesting unacceptable construct validity evidence. Cronbach’s α was 0.75, suggesting acceptable reliability evidence; the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test revealed an insignificant skewness of −0.195 and a kurtosis of 0.001, while the Kruskal–Wallis H test revealed a significance of p < 0.001. The correlation between KASRP and the BWPKQ was 0.69 (p = 0.0001), suggesting acceptable convergent validity evidence. A correlation between KASRP and self-assessed knowledge of −0.59 was also found, which suggests acceptable divergent validity evidence. Conclusions The translated KASRP passed six out of seven tests based on the given sample.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3