Translation and examination of construct validity of the Danish version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia

Author:

Pedersen Majbritt Mostrup1,Carstensen Tina Birgitte Wisbech12,Ørnbøl Eva12,Fink Per12,Jørgensen Torben345,Dantoft Thomas Meinertz3,Frostholm Lisbeth12

Affiliation:

1. The Research Clinic for Functional Disorders, Aarhus University Hospital , Palle Juul Jensens Boulevard 11, 8200 , Aarhus N , Denmark

2. Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University , Aarhus N , Denmark

3. Centre for Clinical Research and Prevention, Bispebjerg/Frederiksberg Hospital, Capital Region , Copenhagen , Denmark

4. Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Copenhagen University , Copenhagen , Denmark

5. Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University , Aalborg , Denmark

Abstract

Abstract Objectives This study investigates the construct validity of the Danish Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK). Methods The English 17-item scale was translated into Danish adhering to WHO’s guidelines. The construct validity of the TSK was examined in a random general population sample of 4,884 18- to 72-year olds with pain within the past 4 weeks. Examination of construct validity adhered to the COSMIN checklist. Structural validity was examined by splitting the sample and conducting exploratory factor analysis on one half and confirmatory factor analysis on the other half. Convergent validity was examined through associations with self-report measures and objective physical performance tests. Reference scores for the TSK were calculated. Results After translation, all respondents felt confident that they understood the meaning of the items. All but one found the questionnaire acceptable. The exploratory factor analysis suggested that a 1-factor 13-item version without 4 reversed items resulted in the most consistent fit across subgroups of gender, age, and severe pain report. Five different models of the TSK were tested in the confirmatory factor analysis. While none were excellent fits, both one- and two-factor models of the TSK-13 and TSK-11 were acceptable. Two-factor models marginally outperformed one-factor models on goodness of fit. There was no association between TSK scores and muscular fitness or self-reported physical activity. Cardiorespiratory fitness, self-perceived physical fitness, and self-efficacy had weak correlations with TSK scores. Scores showed modest associations with self-report measures of anxiety, illness worry, pain interference, and daily limitations. Conclusions Based on an overall consideration of results, we recommend using the TSK-13 as a one-dimensional construct for both research and clinical purposes pending further examinations of the TSK in clinical samples. TSK scores from the present study can serve as a standard of reference for levels of Kinesiophobia in the general population.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference61 articles.

1. Kori SH, Miller RP, Todd DD. Kinisophobia: A new view of chronic pain behavior. Pain Manage January/February. 1990;3:35–43.

2. Lethem J, Slade PD, Troup JD, Bentley G. Outline of a fear-avoidance model of exaggerated pain perception–I. Behav Res Ther. 1983;21(4):401–8. 10.1016/0005-7967(83)90009-8.

3. Vlaeyen JW, Kole-Snijders AM, Boeren RG, van Eek H. Fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic low back pain and its relation to behavioral performance. Pain. 1995;62(3):363–72. 10.1016/030439599400279N.

4. Vlaeyen JW, Kole-Snijders AM, Rotteveel AM, Ruesink R, Heuts PH. The role of fear of movement/(re)injury in pain disability. J Occup Rehabil. 1995;5(4):235–52. 10.1007/BF02109988.

5. Vlaeyen JW, Linton SJ. Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain: a state of the art. Pain. 2000;85(3):317–32. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=MImg&_imagekey=B6T0K-40315FX-2-1&_cdi=4865&_user=642076&_pii=S0304395999002420&_origin=gateway&_coverDate=04%2F01%2F2000&_sk=999149996&view=c&wchp=dGLbVtz-zSkWA&md5=7917f115478550a0a40883f11691aefe&ie=/sdarticle.pdf.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3