Motor-concept variation in the German verbs ‘anfassen’, ‘angreifen’, ‘anlangen’. Differences between Austria, Germany and Switzerland

Author:

Ahlers Timo1,Fink Juliane1

Affiliation:

1. Department of German , University of Vienna Vienna Austria

Abstract

Abstract The semantics of German ‘touch’ verbs include corresponding motor concepts. These seem to result from experiences and learning from subjective bodily actions and interactions with the environment during language acquisition (cf. Bailey 1997). When we learn a new action word, we often do so embedded in a particular motor context (cf. Bailey et al. 1997; Bergen et al. 2004). In this pilot study, we investigate how the motor concepts of German hand-related ‘touch’-verb variants ([an]fassen, [an]greifen, [an]langen, cf. VWB: 38–39, 40, 42) – which are often considered to be true synonyms – are applied by speakers from Austria, Germany and Switzerland. The empirical study draws on research into cognitive semantics (Pulvermüller 2005; Steels & Belpaeme 2005; Barsalou 2008; Evans 2009) and motor cognition (Bailey et al. 1997; Marocco et al. 2010) and aims at adding a variationist linguistic component to the existing research (cf. Fink in prep.). By use of a stimulus response experiment with 25 native speakers from the three countries, we will show a) that the three verb variants differ in terms of motor concepts and therefore are no true synonyms and b) that the motor concepts for each verb differ between speakers of German in Austria, Germany and Switzerland.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics

Reference28 articles.

1. AdA=Elspaß, Stephan & Robert Möller. 2003ff. Atlas zur deutschen Alltagssprache (AdA). http://www.atlas-alltagssprache.de (accessed 11 February 2016).

2. Bailey, David R. 1997. When push comes to shove: a computational model of the role of motor control in the acquisition of action verbs. Berkeley, CA: University of California dissertation.

3. Bailey, David, Jerome Feldman, Srini Narayanan & George Lakoff. 1997. Modeling embodied lexical development. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 19–24, eds. Michael G. Shafto & Pat Langley. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

4. Barsalou, Lawrence W. 2008. Grounded cognition. Annual Reviews of Psychology 59: 617–645.10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639

5. Bergen, Benjamin, Nancy Chang & Shweta Narayanan. 2004. Simulated Action in an Embodied Construction Grammar. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 108–113, eds. Kenneth Forbus, Dedre Gentner & Terry Regier. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3