Affiliation:
1. LATTICE , CNRS–ENS–Sorbonne nouvelle , Montrouge , France
2. Australian National University , Canberra , Australia
Abstract
Abstract
Whether it is based on philological data or on reconstruction, historical linguistics formulates etymological hypotheses that entail changes both in form and in meaning. Semantic change can be understood as a change in “patterns of lexification”, i. e., correspondences between forms and senses. Thus a polysemous word, which once lexified senses s1–s2–s3, evolves so it later encodes s2–s3–s4. Meanings that used to be colexified are now dislexified, and vice versa. Leaning on empirical data from Romance and from Oceanic, this study outlines a general model of historical lexicology, and identifies five types of structural innovations in the lexicon: split, merger, competition, shift, and relexification.
The theoretical discussion is made easier by using a visual approach to structural change, in the form of diachronic maps. Semantic maps have already proven useful to represent synchronic patterns of lexification, outlining each language’s emic categories against a grid of etic senses. The same principle can be profitably used when analysing lexification patterns in diachrony: lexical change is then viewed as the reconfiguration of sense clusters in a semantic space. Maps help us visualize the “lexical tectonics” at play as words evolve over time, gradually shifting their meaning, gaining or losing semantic territory, colliding with each other, or disappearing forever.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference65 articles.
1. Barðdal, Jóhanna, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer & Spike Gildea (eds.). 2015. Diachronic construction grammar (Construction Approaches to Language 18). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
2. Blank, Andreas & Peter Koch. 1999. Onomasiologie et étymologie cognitive: L’exemple de la tête. In Mario Vilela & Fatima Silva (eds.), Actas do 1o Encontro Internacional de Linguística Cognitiva, 49–72. Porto: Faculdade de Letras.
3. Blythe, Richard A. & William Croft. 2012. S-curves and the mechanisms of propagation in language change. Language 88(2). 269–304.
4. Brown, Cecil. 2013. Hand and arm. In Matthew Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://wals.info/chapter/129 (27 July 2021).
5. Chambers, J. K. 2002. Patterns of variation including change. In J. K. Chambers, Peter Trudgill, Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds.), The handbook of language variation and change, 349–372. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献