Affiliation:
1. Philosophisches Seminar, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen , Göttingen, 37073 , Germany
2. Academia Kantiana, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University , Kaliningrad, 236016 , Russian Federation
Abstract
Abstract
It is not just rationalist metaphysics, but also Kant’s transcendental philosophy that is teeming with a priori concepts. According to Kant, some of these a priori concepts are “ideas,” and similar to the categories, some of these ideas in turn belong to the nature of human reason, while others can be derived from them. It is therefore part of Kant’s claim in the “Transcendental Dialectic” to be able to explain not only the leading ideas of rational psychology, cosmology, and theology as natural concepts of reason, but the origin of the entire a priori vocabulary of the metaphysica specialis as well. This article outlines how Kant’s derivations of these concepts work. After explaining Kant’s classification of a priori concepts and the derivation of the transcendental ideas, his derivations are explored in more detail using the example of the concepts of the pure doctrine of the soul. This contributes to a better understanding of Kant’s theory of philosophical concepts while also shedding light on the rather rarely treated topic of the “Transcendental Dialectic.”
Reference41 articles.
1. Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb. Metaphysica. 4th edition. Halle: Hemmerde, 1757.
2. Brocker, Manfred. Kants Besitzlehre. Zur Problematik einer transzendentalphilosophischen Eigentumslehre. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 1987.
3. Bunte, Martin. Erkenntnis und Funktion. Zur Vollständigkeit der Urteilstafel und Einheit des kantischen Systems. Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter, 2016.
4. Caimi, Mario. “Der Begriff der praktisch-dogmatischen Metaphysik.” In Über die Fortschritte der kritischen Metaphysik. Beiträge zu System und Architektonik der kantischen Philosophie, edited by Andree Hahmann and Bernd Ludwig, 157–70. Hamburg: Meiner, 2017.
5. Caimi, Mario. “La deducción metafísica de las ideas a partir de las formas del silogosmo.” Revista de Estudios Kantianos 4:2 (2019), 452–75.