Affiliation:
1. Reilly Center for Science, Technology, and Values, University of Notre Dame , Notre Dame , USA
Abstract
AbstractI present an account of nihilism, following Foucault and Nietzsche, as a sort of colonization of our thinking by a religious form of normativity, grounded in our submission to truth as correspondence, in the idea that the facts themselves could be binding upon us. I then present Brassier’s radicalization of nihilism and showed how it remains subservient to this religious ideal of truth. I argue, further, that far than showing how a commitment to Enlightenment reason and science demands a cold metaphysics of death, in dismissing the irreducibly plural ways in which what is determines thought, Brassier’s attempt to secure a fit between thought and disenchanted world suggests that the view is an expression of the unliveable condition of nihilism, rather than its proof. Finally, I present a form of naturalism that makes legitimate claim to the legacy of Enlightenment, drawing from French historical epistemology, and dispenses with the problems animating Brassier’s nihilism by radically transforming the concept of truth and how we relate to it.
Reference56 articles.
1. Anscombe, G. E. M. “Modern Moral Philosophy.” Philosophy 33:124 (1958), 1–19.
2. Assmann, J. The Invention of Religion: Faith and Covenant in the Book of Exodus, trans. Robert Savage. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press, 2018.
3. Assmann, J. Of God and Gods: Egypt, Israel, and the Rise of Monotheism. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 2008.
4. Bakker, Scott. “From Scripture to Fantasy: Adrian Johnston and the Problem of Continental Fundamentalism.” Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 13, no. 1 (2017), 522–51.
5. Brandom, Robert. “Linguistic Pragmatism and Pragmatism about Norms: An Arc of Thought from Rorty’s Eliminative Materialism to his Pragmatism.” In Perspectives on Pragmatism: Classical, Recent, and Contemporary, 107–15. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2011.