Affiliation:
1. Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne , Paris , France
Abstract
Abstract
This article addresses the issue of realism in relationship to contemporary serial fiction. Drawing on The Bureau (Canal+, 2015–2020), it argues that spy TV series are “realistic” not because they correspond to reality but because of their impact on reality. It begins by giving an overview of the many ways in which “realism,” in the ordinary sense of a resemblance with reality, served as the working framework for The Bureau’s team. It then identifies three distinct types of realisms in the series. The first is a “fictional realism,” namely the ability of The Bureau to conform to the aesthetic and narrative conventions of realistic fictions. The second type of realism, which I qualify as “ordinary,” refers to the possibilities offered by the show’s aesthetics and the enmeshment of The Bureau with viewers’ ordinary experience. The third type of “performative realism” refers to the series’ impact on shared representations and reality. By providing a common language about the secret activities of the state, The Bureau has gone from being a framed version of reality to being one of the defining frameworks through which state secrecy is experienced both individually and collectively, by insiders and the public at large.
Reference81 articles.
1. Arendt, Hannah. “Truth and Politics,” 223–59. New York: Penguin, 2006 [1967].
2. Aron, Raymond. Peace & War: A Theory of International Relations, Piscataway: Transaction Publishers, 2003.
3. Bazin, André. What Is Cinema? Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967.
4. Benoist, Jocelyn. Toward a Contextual Realism. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 2021.
5. Betts, Richard K. “Analysis, War and Decision, Why Intelligence Failures are Inevitable.” World Politics 31:1 (1978), 61–89.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献