Affiliation:
1. 1Eötvös Lóránd University,Budapest, Hungary
Abstract
Abstract Walking is an activity that always unfolds within a certain landscape. Tim Ingold has used the notion of “taskscape” to denote pragmatic uses of terrain. Whilst walking, we come to intersect with a variety of taskscapes. As Julia Tanney has highlighted, formal language can only get us so far when thinking about spontaneous, non-theoretical and non-representational activities. Borrowing Gilbert Ryle’s distinction between “knowing that” and knowing how”, I argue for a concept of walking that does not privilege intentions. When somebody walks, they melt into a taskscape not entirely of their own design. Mind is inherently ecological. It is enacted within a certain ecology, and is actually inseparable from its environment. Mind is the sum of intelligent enactments. According to the position I seek to advance in this article, walking may be approached in an object-oriented manner. Each form of behavior composes an enactment that meshes with a certain ecology, what W. Teed Rockwell has called a “behavioral field.” Mind is the inherently relational enactment of a set of behavioral dispositions which are always already enmeshed within a field. When these dispositions enter what, following Markus Gabriel, may be called “fields of sense”, mind and walking become independent objects in their own right.
Reference15 articles.
1. in the Mass The MIT;Skrbina,2005
2. The Visible the Invisible Northwestern University;Merleau;trans,1968
3. The Concept of New York;Ryle;Mind,2002
4. Adam The System of Absentology in Ontological Newcastle upon Scholars Publishing;Lovasz;Philosophy,2016
5. Julia Remarks on the thickness of action description : with Wittgenstein;Tanney;Philosophical Explorations,2018