Affiliation:
1. Institute of Philosophy, Department of Continental Philosophy and Religious Studies, Vilnius University , Vilnius , LT-01513 , Lithuania
Abstract
Abstract
According to Viveiros de Castro, comparison as ontology defines the ontological turn in anthropology. It presents a necessity for philosophy to approach the matter with comparative strategy. Morten Pedersen claims that ontological turn should be interpreted as a fulfillment of an anthropological version of Husserl’s method. Thus, phenomenology enters the field of interest along with its critique in Speculative Realism. In this article, we will see clearly why this selection is not accidental but rather unavoidable. Amerindian perspectivism necessitates the philosophical reconceptualization of perspective in general, which is to be taken as a challenge for the established discourses. The need arises to rethink the problematic of Kantian perspectivism and its offspring. Amerindian perspectivism proposes cosmological deictics that hold a spatiality of the perspective of the other, of the in-itself, thus it comes into an opposition to Kant’s system. Phenomenological perspective, as one of the Kantian offspring, faces a predicament that is interwoven with the critique of correlationism arriving from Speculative Realisms. The synthetic character of phenomenology allows enough flexibility for it to traverse these recent charges. We will draw a comparative picture of dynamic co-evolution of strains of recent thought, striving for a synthetic multiplicity, permeated by a common perspectival thread.
Reference41 articles.
1. Beck, Maximilian. “The Last Phase of Husserl’s Phenomenology: An Exposition and a Criticism.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 1:4 (1941), 479–91. International Phenomenological Society. Accessed January 13, 2021. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2103149.
2. Berghofer, Philipp. “Scientific Perspectivism in the Phenomenological Tradition.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 10:30 (2020), 1–36. Switzerland AG: Springer Nature. Accessed December 21, 2020. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/17173/.
3. Berry, Jessica N. Nietzsche and the Ancient Skeptical Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
4. Campos, Margarita Vázquez and Gutiérrez, Antonio Manuel Liz (eds.). Temporal Points of View: Subjective and Objective Aspects. Dordrecht: Springer, 2015.
5. Čargonja, Hrvoje. “Bodies and Worlds Alive: An Outline of Phenomenology in Anthropology.” Studia Ethnologica Croatica 25 (2013), 19–60. Zagreb: HRČAK. Accessed December 1, 2021. https://hrcak.srce.hr/112103.