Securitising the Present through the Prism of the Past: State-Building and the Legacy of Interventions in Kosovo and Serbia

Author:

Distler Werner1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. DFG Collaborative Research Centre SFB/TRR 138 “Dynamics of Security. Types of Securitization from a Historical Perspective”, Center for Conflict Studies, Philipps University Marburg , Marburg , Germany

Abstract

Abstract In this article, the author argues that political actors in Kosovo and Serbia, together with international actors from the UN, NATO, and the EU, have developed strategies of political communication in which the threat or promise of external intervention in Southeast European processes of state-building and state consolidation have been deeply inscribed. Based on a critical security studies theoretical framework, especially pragmatist securitisation, the author illustrates such “securitised state-building” with speech acts on interethnic violence, the Kosovo army, and NATO intervention commemorations. While securitised language does not necessarily lead to violence, actors with communicative strategies of segregation, confrontation, and even violence have proven more likely to be favoured by the governing mode of “securitised state-building”. Such a mode thereby may shape regional processes of de- and re-territorialisation in the future, too.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference109 articles.

1. Bailey, F., and V. Hopkins. 2017. “Serbian President Warns of Intervention ‘If Serb Lives Are Endangered’.” Prishtina Insight, 15 January, https://prishtinainsight.com/serbian-president-warns-intervention-serb-lives-endangered/ (accessed 10 December 2021).

2. Balzacq, T. 2005. “The Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience and Context.” European Journal of International Relations 1 (2): 171–201, https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066105052960.

3. Begisholli, B. 2019. “Kosovo Fires Deputy Minister for ‘NATO Genocide’ Comment.” Balkan Insight, 25 March, https://balkaninsight.com/2019/03/25/kosovo-fires-deputy-minister-for-nato-genocide-comment/ (accessed 13 December 2021).

4. Beha, A. 2011. “Decentralisation in Kosovo: A Challenge to Deal With?” Journal of Peace, Conflict and Development 17: 23–42.

5. Beha, A. 2014. “Minority Rights: An Opportunity for Adjustment of Ethnic Relations in Kosovo.” Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe 13 (4): 85–110.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3