Affiliation:
1. Department of History , Trinity College Dublin , Dublin , Ireland
Abstract
Abstract
Between August and September 1989, Russian-speaking workers in Moldova went on strike against a series of laws that made Moldovan the sole official language of the republic. While workers from across the republic participated, it was only in the Transnistrian region that a group such as the United Soviet of Work Collectives (OSTK) was able to use the strikes to usurp power. This article questions why the strikes destabilised the Transnistrian region but not the other predominantly Russian-speaking regions that participated. The author argues that there were three reasons for this. Firstly, local political elites in Transnistria were largely inactive, creating a power vacuum the OSTK was willing and able to fill. Secondly, the OSTK launched an effective propaganda campaign aimed at undermining people’s trust in existing institutions. Finally, the Russian-speaking inhabitants of Transnistria were more hostile to Moldovan cultural demands than their counterparts elsewhere in the republic.
Funder
National University of Ireland
Reference20 articles.
1. Andsager, Julie L. 2000. “How Competing Interest Groups Attempt to Shape Public Opinion with Competing News Frames.” Journalism and Media Communications Quarterly 78: 557–92.
2. Benn, David W. 1985. “Soviet Propaganda: The Theory and the Practice.” The World Today 41 (6): 112–5.
3. Cașu, Igor. 2015. “Moldova under the Soviet Communist Regime: History and Memory.” In Remembrance, History, and Justice: Coming to Terms with Traumatic Pasts in Democratic Societies, edited by Vladimir Tismaneanu, and Bogdan C. Iacob, 347–72. London: Central European University Press.
4. Deletant, Dennis. 1996. “Language Policy and Linguistic Trends in the Republic of Moldavia, 1924–1992.” In Studies in Moldovan, edited by Donald L. Dyer, 53–88. Columbia: East European Monographs.
5. Dahrendorf, Ralf. 1986. Essays in the Theory of Society. Stanford: Routledge.