From Kosovo Rush to Mass Atrocities’ Hush. German Debates since Unification

Author:

Hering Robin1ORCID,Stahl Bernhard1

Affiliation:

1. Chair of International Politics, University of Passau , Passau , Germany

Abstract

Abstract Germany’s involvement in the Kosovo War marked its first active participation in combat operations since the Second World War. For many observers at the time, the intervention represented a fundamental policy shift in the West, and in Germany in particular. Mass atrocities, no longer to be observed from the sidelines, were now to be actively prevented. Twenty years later, this stance seems rather puzzling. Mass atrocities continued to be committed; Germany has neither championed efforts to prevent such acts, nor has it been proactive in this regard. In this article, the authors develop three proxies that serve to indicate whether mass atrocities were highly politicised: the existence of parliamentary debates, media coverage, and church statements. They show that Kosovo is an outlier within an otherwise clear continuity of German political silencing in the face of mass atrocities. To prove this claim, they turn to German domestic debates on twelve mass atrocity cases abroad since the country’s unification in 1990.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference56 articles.

1. Bach, J. 1999. Between Sovereignty and Integration: German Foreign Policy and National Identity After 1989 (Forschungsberichte Internationale Politik 23). Münster: Lit-Verlag.

2. Baumann, R. 2006. Der Wandel des deutschen Multilateralismus: Eine diskursanalytische Untersuchung deutscher Außenpolitik. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

3. Bellamy, A. J. 2011. Mass Atrocities and Armed Conflict: Links, Distinctions, and Implications for the Responsibility to Prevent: Appendices. Stanley Foundation Policy Analysis Brief, https://stanleycenter.org/publications/pab/BellmayAppendices22011.pdf. (accessed 15 March 2022).

4. Berger, T. U. 1998. Cultures of Antimilitarism: National Security in Germany and Japan. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

5. Buzan, B., O. Waever, and J. de Wilde. 1998. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3