A system mapping activity to visualize lithium’s interconnectedness to societal and environmental aspects of the green energy transition
Author:
Delaney Seamus1ORCID, Donnelly Scott2, Rochette Emily3ORCID, Orgill MaryKay4ORCID
Affiliation:
1. 2104 School of Education, Deakin University , Burwood , Australia 2. Division of Science and Mathematics , 31692 Arizona Western College , Yuma , USA 3. Faculty of Education , 153395 University of Melbourne , Melbourne , Australia 4. Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry , 14722 University of Nevada , Las Vegas , USA
Abstract
Abstract
Lithium’s role in the global green energy transition provides an engaging context to visualize the interconnectedness of chemistry to seismic shifts taking place in society. Lithium has seen a dramatic increase in utilization, but given lithium’s current low rates of recyclability, this development is exacerbating the e-waste problem. Equally important, we posit that lithium extraction, from either brine or ore, and the associated impacts on the environment and local communities should not be so easily decoupled from the shift in human behaviors causing its demand. Presented here is a mapping activity that was trialed in professional learning workshops organized in New Zealand for secondary/high school chemistry teachers. In their mapping activity response, the teachers were able to connect typical school chemistry content (batteries, chemical processes) with environmental (planetary systems) and social, economic, and ethical considerations (useful products, unintended consequences, inequity in access to water) of the ongoing electrification of society. The teachers indicated a positive intention to utilize the activity, or one similar with a different chemical process or product, in their own classrooms. A school-ready version of the activity is provided in the supplementary information, which was revised based on feedback from the teachers attending the workshops.
Funder
Secondary Chemistry Educators New Zealand International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference74 articles.
1. Aubrecht, K. B., Dori, Y. J., Holme, T. A., Lavi, R., Matlin, S. A., Orgill, M., & Skaza-Acosta, H. (2019). Graphical tools for conceptualizing systems thinking in chemistry education. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(12), 2888–2900. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b00314 2. Azadi, M., Northey, S. A., Ali, S. H., & Edraki, M. (2020). Transparency on greenhouse gas emissions from mining to enable climate change mitigation. Nature Geoscience, 13, 100–104. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-0531-3. 3. Baker, K. A., & Campbell, N. J. (2020). Combatting teen vaping in school settings. Journal of Addictions Nursing, 31(2), 73. https://doi.org/10.1097/JAN.0000000000000330 4. Bobba, S., Mathieux, F., Ardente, F., Blengini, G. A., Cusenza, M. A., Podias, A., & Pfrang, A. (2018). Life cycle assessment of repurposed electric vehicle batteries: An adapted method based on modelling energy flows. Journal of Energy Storage, 19, 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2018.07.008 5. Bruce, S., Delaval, B., Moisi, A., Ford, J., West, J., Loh, J., & Hayward, J. (2021). Critical energy minerals roadmap. Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO). Retrieved from https://www.csiro.au/-/media/Do-Business/Files/Futures/Critical-energy-minerals-roadmap/21-00041_MR_REPORT_CriticalEnergyMineralsRoadmap_WEB_210420.pdf
|
|