Univariate Tests for Phase Capacity: Tools for Identifying When to Modify a Survey’s Data Collection Protocol

Author:

Lewis Taylor1

Affiliation:

1. U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) , 1900 E Street, NW, Washington , DC 20415 . United States of America .

Abstract

Abstract To mitigate the potentially harmful effects of nonresponse, most surveys repeatedly follow up with nonrespondents, often targeting a response rate or predetermined number of completes. Each additional recruitment attempt generally brings in a new wave of data, but returns gradually diminish over the course of a fixed data collection protocol, as each subsequent wave tends to consist of fewer responses than the last. Consequently, point estimates begin to stabilize. This is the notion of phase capacity, suggesting some form of design change is in order, such as switching modes, increasing the incentive, or, as is considered exclusively in this research, discontinuing the nonrespondent follow-up campaign altogether. A previously proposed test for phase capacity calls for multiply imputing nonrespondents’ missing data to assess, retrospectively, whether the most recent wave of data significantly altered a key, nonresponse-adjusted point estimate. This study introduces a more flexible adaptation amenable to surveys that instead reweight the observed data to compensate for nonresponse. Results from a simulation study and application indicate that, all else equal, the weighting version of the test is more sensitive to point estimate changes, thereby dictating more follow-up attempts are warranted.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference55 articles.

1. Atrostic, B., N. Bates, G. Burt, and A. Silberstein. 2001. “Nonresponse in US Government Household Surveys: Consistent Measures, Recent Trends, and New Insights.” Journal of Official Statistics 17: 209–226.

2. Bates, N. and K. Creighton. 2000. “The Last Five Percent: What Can We Learn from Difficult/Late Interviews?” In Proceedings of the Section on Government Statistics and the Section on Social Statistics: American Statistical Association, 2000: 120–125, Washington, DC. Available at: https://s3.amazonaws.com/sitesusa/wp-content/uploads/sites/242/2014/05/IHSNG-asa2000proceedings.pdf (accessed April 2017).

3. Beaumont, J., C. Bocci, and D. Haziza. 2014. “An Adaptive Data Collection Procedure for Call Prioritization.” Journal of Official Statistics 30: 607–621. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/jos-2014-0040.10.2478/jos-2014-0040

4. Bethlehem, J., F. Cobben, and B. Schouten. 2011. Handbook of Nonresponse in Household Surveys. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.10.1002/9780470891056

5. Biemer, P. and L. Lyberg. 2003. Introduction to Survey Quality. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.10.1002/0471458740

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3