Affiliation:
1. Social and Economic Housing Statistics Division, U.S. Census Bureau, 4600 Silver Hill Road, Washington, DC 20233, United States of America
Abstract
Abstract
The Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement (CPS ASEC) serves as the data source for official income, poverty, and inequality statistics in the United States. In 2014, the CPS ASEC questionnaire was redesigned to improve data quality and to reduce misreporting, item nonresponse, and errors resulting from respondent fatigue. The sample was split into two groups, with nearly 70% receiving the traditional instrument and 30% receiving the redesigned instrument. Due to the relatively small redesign sample, analyses of changes in income and poverty between this and future years may lack sufficient power, especially for subgroups. The traditional sample is treated as if the responses were missing for income sources targeted by the redesign, and multiple imputation is used to generate plausible responses. A flexible imputation technique is used to place individuals into strata along two dimensions: 1) their probability of income recipiency and 2) their expected income conditional on recipiency for each income source. By matching on these two dimensions, this approach combines the ideas of propensity score matching and predictive means matching. In this article, this approach is implemented, the matching models are evaluated using diagnostics, and the results are analyzed.
Reference18 articles.
1. Bondarenko, I. and T.E. Raghunathan. 2007. “Multiple Imputations Using Sequential Semi and Nonparametric Regressions.” In Proceedings Section on Survey Research Methods: American Statistical Association, July 29, 2007. 3293-3300. Salt Lake City, UT. Available at: http://ww2.amstat.org/sections/srms/Proceedings/y2007/Files/JSM2007-000624.pdf (accessed November 2016).
2. Clogg, C.C., D.B. Rubin, N. Schenker, B. Schultz, and L. Weidman. 1991. “Multiple Imputation of Industry and Occupation Codes in Census Public-use Samples Using Bayesian Logistic Regression.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 86: 68-78. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1991.10475005.
3. Czajka, J.L. and G. Denmead. 2008. “Income Data for Policy Analysis: A Comparative Assessment of Eight Surveys.” Mathematica Reference No.: 6302-601. Available at: https://www.mathematica-mpr.com/,/media/publications/PDFs/incomedata.pdf (accessed November 2016).
4. Hokayem, C., T.E. Raghunathan, and J. Rothbaum. 2015. “SRMI in the CPS ASEC.” Unpublished Manuscript.
5. He, Y. and T.E. Raghunathan. 2006. “Tukey’s gh Distribution for Multiple Imputation.” The American Statistician 60: 251-256. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1198/000313006X126819.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献