The feasibility of a mystery case curriculum to enhance diagnostic reasoning skills among medical students: a process evaluation
Author:
Snyder Christopher1, Smith Michael1, Snyder Kailey2
Affiliation:
1. Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine , University of Nebraska Medical Center , Omaha NE , USA 2. Education and Child Development , Munroe Meyer Institute, University of Nebraska Medical Center , Omaha NE , USA
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Within a Hospital Medicine division at a large academic institution, an innovative program has been developed to offer third year medical learners enrolled in their Internal Medicine Clerkship the opportunity to deepen their diagnostic reasoning skills with a weekly case-based learning activity entitled “Hospital Medicine’s Mystery Case of the Week”. The mystery case curriculum has four primary learning objectives (1): To understand the value of employing a multisystem approach to a common presenting problem (2); To apply a diagnostic schema to a clinical problem (3); To apply knowledge of cost appropriate workups to a clinical case and (4) To identify cognitive biases that can influence decision making in the context of treating a clinical problem.
Methods
A process evaluation of the mystery case curriculum was conducted over a 6-month implementation period. The process evaluation was guided by eight domains of focus: program acceptability, demand, implementation, practicality, adaptation, integration, expansion and limited-efficacy testing. Measures included a pre/post mixed-methods survey, attendance log and timesheet. Pre/post survey data was analyzed via paired samples t-tests and open-ended responses were analyzed via a deductive content analysis.
Results
Process evaluation findings demonstrated the program had high levels of acceptability and demand. Survey findings suggest the curriculum may increase feelings of preparedness for Internal Medicine exams as well as student interest, comfort and confidence related to diagnostic processes.
Conclusions
Future evaluations should work to understand the influence this curriculum has on diagnostic accuracy within a clinical setting.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference15 articles.
1. Bowen, JL. Educational strategies to promote clinical diagnostic reasoning. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2217–25. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmra054782. 2. Eva, KW. What every teacher needs to know about clinical reasoning. Med Educ 2005;39:98–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01972.x. 3. Imanieh, MH, Dehghani, SM, Sobhani, AR, Haghighat, M. Evaluation of problem-based learning in medical students’ education. J Adv Med Educ Prof 2014;2:1. 4. Thistlethwaite, JE, Davies, D, Ekeocha, S, Kidd, JM, MacDougall, C, Matthews, P, et al.. The effectiveness of case-based learning in health professional education. A BEME systematic review: BEME guide no. 23. Med Teach 2012;34:e421–44. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2012.680939. 5. Thomas, PA, Kern, DE, Hughes, MT, Tackett, SA, Chen, BY, editors. Curriculum development for medical education: a six-step approach. Baltimore, Maryland: JHU Press; 2022.
|
|