What’s going well: a qualitative analysis of positive patient and family feedback in the context of the diagnostic process

Author:

Liu Stephen K.12,Bourgeois Fabienne34,Dong Joe5,Harcourt Kendall5,Lowe Elizabeth6,Salmi Liz5,Thomas Eric J.78,Riblet Natalie12,Bell Sigall K.45

Affiliation:

1. White River Junction VA Medical Center , White River Junction , VT , USA

2. Department of Medicine , Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth , Hanover , NH , USA

3. Department of Pediatrics , Boston Children’s Hospital , Boston , MA , USA

4. Department of Medicine , Harvard Medical School , Boston , MA , USA

5. Department of Medicine , Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center , Boston , MA , USA

6. Patient and Family Advisory Council, Department of Social Work , Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center , Boston , MA , USA

7. Department of Medicine , University of Texas McGovern Medical School , Houston , TX , USA

8. Center for Healthcare Quality and Safety , Memorial Hermann Texas Medical Center , Houston , TX , USA

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Accurate and timely diagnosis relies on close collaboration between patients/families and clinicians. Just as patients have unique insights into diagnostic breakdowns, positive patient feedback may also generate broader perspectives on what constitutes a “good” diagnostic process (DxP). Methods We evaluated patient/family feedback on “what’s going well” as part of an online pre-visit survey designed to engage patients/families in the DxP. Patients/families living with chronic conditions with visits in three urban pediatric subspecialty clinics (site 1) and one rural adult primary care clinic (site 2) were invited to complete the survey between December 2020 and March 2022. We adapted the Healthcare Complaints Analysis Tool (HCAT) to conduct a qualitative analysis on a subset of patient/family responses with ≥20 words. Results In total, 7,075 surveys were completed before 18,129 visits (39 %) at site 1, and 460 surveys were completed prior to 706 (65 %) visits at site 2. Of all participants, 1,578 volunteered positive feedback, ranging from 1–79 words. Qualitative analysis of 272 comments with ≥20 words described: Relationships (60 %), Clinical Care (36 %), and Environment (4 %). Compared to primary care, subspecialty comments showed the same overall rankings. Within Relationships, patients/families most commonly noted: thorough and competent attention (46 %), clear communication and listening (41 %) and emotional support and human connection (39 %). Within Clinical Care, patients highlighted: timeliness (31 %), effective clinical management (30 %), and coordination of care (25 %). Conclusions Patients/families valued relationships with clinicians above all else in the DxP, emphasizing the importance of supporting clinicians to nurture effective relationships and relationship-centered care in the DxP.

Funder

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Medicine (miscellaneous)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3