Preferred language and diagnostic errors in the pediatric emergency department
Author:
Lowe Jeremiah T.1ORCID, Leonard Jan2, Dominguez Fidelity3, Widmer Kaitlin13, Deakyne Davies Sara J.3, Wiersma Alexandria J.13, Mendenhall Marcela13, Grubenhoff Joseph A.13
Affiliation:
1. University of Colorado School of Medicine , Aurora , CO , USA 2. Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia , Philadelphia , PN , USA 3. Children’s Hospital Colorado , Aurora , CO , USA
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
To investigate the relationship between language and diagnostic errors (DxE) in the pediatric emergency department (ED).
Methods
Electronic trigger identified ED encounters resulting in unplanned hospital admission that occurred within 10 days of an index visit from January 2018 through February 2022. Manual screening of each triggered encounter identified cases where the index visit diagnosis and hospitalization discharge diagnosis differed, and these were screened in for review using the Revised Safer Dx instrument to determine if a diagnostic error (DxE) occurred. Non-English primary language (NEPL) and English-proficient (EP) groups were established based on caregiver language. The primary outcome was the proportion of DxE each group. Data were analyzed using univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression to identify independent predictors of DxE.
Results
Electronic trigger identified 3,551 patients, of which 806 (22.7 %) screened in for Safer Dx review. 172 (21.3 %) experienced DxE. The proportion of DxE was similar between EP and NEPL groups (21.5 vs. 21.7 %; p=0.97). Age≥12 years and fewer prior admissions in the preceding 6 months predicted higher odds of DxE. NEPL did not predict higher odds of DxE.
Conclusions
NEPL was not associated with increased odds DxE resulting in unplanned admission.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference25 articles.
1. Singh, H, Khanna, A, Spitzmueller, C, Meyer, AND. Recommendations for using the Revised Safer Dx Instrument to help measure and improve diagnostic safety. Diagnosis 2019;6:315–23. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2019-0012. 2. Schiff, GD, Hasan, O, Kim, S, Abrams, R, Cosby, K, Lambert, BL, et al.. Diagnostic error in medicine: analysis of 583 physician-reported errors. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1881–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinternmed.2009.333. 3. Care C on DE in H, Services B on HC, Medicine I of, Sciences & TNA of. Improving Diagnosis in Health Care, Balogh, EP, Miller, BT, Ball, JR, editors. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2015. 4. Stokes, SC, Jackson, JE, Beres, AL. Impact of limited English proficiency on definitive care in pediatric appendicitis. J Surg Res 2021;267:284–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2021.05.024. 5. Levas, MN, Dayan, PS, Mittal, MK, Stevenson, MD, Bachur, RG, Dudley, NC, et al.. Effect of hispanic ethnicity and language barriers on appendiceal perforation rates and imaging in children. J Pediatr 2014;164:1286–91.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.01.006.
|
|