Towards diagnostic excellence on academic ward teams: building a conceptual model of team dynamics in the diagnostic process
Author:
Choi Justin J.1ORCID, Rosen Michael A.2, Shapiro Martin F.1, Safford Monika M.1
Affiliation:
1. Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine , New York , NY , USA 2. Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, and JHSOM Simulation Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine , Baltimore , MD , USA
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
Achieving diagnostic excellence on medical wards requires teamwork and effective team dynamics. However, the study of ward team dynamics in teaching hospitals is relatively underdeveloped. We aim to enhance understanding of how ward team members interact in the diagnostic process and of the underlying behavioral, psychological, and cognitive mechanisms driving team interactions.
Methods
We used mixed-methods to develop and refine a conceptual model of how ward team dynamics in an academic medical center influence the diagnostic process. First, we systematically searched existing literature for conceptual models and empirical studies of team dynamics. Then, we conducted field observations with thematic analysis to refine our model.
Results
We present a conceptual model of how medical ward team dynamics influence the diagnostic process, which serves as a roadmap for future research and interventions in this area. We identified three underexplored areas of team dynamics that are relevant to diagnostic excellence and that merit future investigation (1): ward team structures (e.g., team roles, responsibilities) (2); contextual factors (e.g., time constraints, location of team members, culture, diversity); and (3) emergent states (shared mental models, psychological safety, team trust, and team emotions).
Conclusions
Optimizing the diagnostic process to achieve diagnostic excellence is likely to depend on addressing all of the potential barriers and facilitators to ward team dynamics presented in our model.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Subject
Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference69 articles.
1. Committee on Diagnostic Error in Health Care, Board on Health Care Services, Institute of Medicine, The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Improving diagnosis in health care, Balogh, EP, Miller, BT, Ball, JR, editors. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2015. 2. Singh, H, Graber, ML. Improving diagnosis in health care – the next imperative for patient safety. N Engl J Med 2015;373:2493–5. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmp1512241. 3. Meyer, AND, Singh, H. The path to diagnostic excellence includes feedback to calibrate how clinicians think. JAMA 2019;321:737–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.0113. 4. Centor, RM, Geha, R, Manesh, R. The pursuit of diagnostic excellence. JAMA Netw Open 2019;2:e1918040. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18040. 5. Singh, H, Connor, DM, Dhaliwal, G. Five strategies for clinicians to advance diagnostic excellence. BMJ 2022;376:e068044. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-068044.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|