User independent tool for the analysis of data from tensile testing for database systems
Author:
Babaei Nima1ORCID, Wang Jing1, Kisseler Elisabeth1, Ackermann Marc1, Wipp Sebastian1, Gramlich Alexander1, Krupp Ulrich1
Affiliation:
1. Steel Institute , RWTH Aachen University , Intzestraße 1, 52072 Aachen , Germany
Abstract
Abstract
Data streams in science and economy are becoming increasingly automatized. This has various advantages compared to previous, user-dependent analyses, in which the same results are analyzed differently by different persons. Even though these differences are only of a certain degree, they can lead to false estimations of underlying material and process parameters as well as to missing comparability. In order to automatize previously user-dependent processes in the analysis of material tests, a modular database management system, called idCarl, has been developed. This system places a module as analysis pipeline between the experimental machine and the database. The database management system can be expanded with diverse modules, enabling the generation of user-independent data, which are fed automatically into the database. To provide an example, a module is applied to the common procedure of tensile testing based on DIN EN ISO 6892 and CWA 15261-2. The module determines automatically Young’s modulus and other parameters derived thereof. The method for determining the measurement uncertainties of the Young’s modulus is improved and compatibility with the “Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement” (GUM) is achieved. The existing method in ISO and CWA standards provides in some cases an underestimation of about 112 %.
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference25 articles.
1. M. Ackermann, D. Iren, S. Wesselmecking, D. Shetty, and U. Krupp, “Automated segmentation of martensite-austenite islands in bainitic steel,” Mater. Charact., vol. 191, p. 112091, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2022.112091. 2. M. Linderov, C. Segel, A. Weidner, H. Biermann, and A. Vinogradov, “Deformation mechanisms in austenitic TRIP/TWIP steels at room and elevated temperature investigated by acoustic emission and scanning electron microscopy,” Mater. Sci. Eng., A, vol. 597, pp. 183–193, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2013.12.094. 3. N. Leavitt, “Will NoSQL databases live up to their promise?” Computer, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 12–14, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1109/mc.2010.58. 4. T. Bergs, S. Gierlings, T. Auerbach, A. Klink, D. Schraknepper, and T. Augspurger, “The concept of digital twin and digital shadow in manufacturing,” Proc. CIRP, vol. 101, pp. 81–84, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.02.010. 5. M. R. Liebenberg, Autonomous Agents for the World Wide Lab: Artificial Intelligence in the Manufacturing Industry, Aachen, RWTH Aachen University, 2021.
|
|