Effect of bonding conditions on mechanical performance of DP600 steels at different ambient temperatures-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Effect of bonding conditions on mechanical performance of DP600 steels at different ambient temperatures

Published:2023-08-28 Issue:11 Volume:65 Page:1686-1695
ISSN:0025-5300
Container-title:Materials Testing
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Çavuşoğlu Oktay¹²^ORCID,Bolova Işıl²³,Aydın Hakan⁴,Kara Ali⁵,Güzeldağ Berna²,Dinkçi Haluk²

Affiliation:

1. Department of Mechanical Engineering , Faculty of Engineering , Düzce University , Düzce , Türkiye

2. TOFAŞ, Turkish Automotive Factory , Bursa , Türkiye

3. Division of Polymer Materials , Bursa Uludağ University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Science , Bursa , Türkiye

4. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Bursa Uludağ University , 16059 , Bursa , Türkiye

5. Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Arts and Sciences , Bursa Uludag University , Bursa , Türkiye

Abstract

Abstract Adhesive bonding is used to join materials that are difficult to join with other joining methods. In this study, the effects of adhesive bonding curing conditions and different ambient conditions on the tensile shear loading process were investigated for dual-phase 600 steel materials that are widely preferred in the automotive industry. Steel sheets used in the automotive industry are exposed to environmental conditions at different temperatures. For this purpose, uniaxial tensile tests at different ambient temperatures were carried out to determine the mechanical properties of the adhesive bonded materials. The curing conditions affect adhesive mechanical properties. The lap shear strength decreased as the ambient temperature increased.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,Mechanics of Materials,General Materials Science

Link

https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/mt-2023-0020/pdf

Reference36 articles.

1. N. Altan Özbek and O. Özbek, “Effect of cryogenic treatment holding time on mechanical and microstructural properties of Sverker 21 steel,” Mater. Test., vol. 64, no. 12, pp. 1809–1817, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2022-0207.

2. M. Y. Sun, X. L. Wang, Z. Q. Wang, et al.., “The critical impact of intercritical deformation on variant pairing of bainite/martensite in dual-phase steels,” Mater. Sci. Eng., A, vol. 771, 2020, Art. no. 138668, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2019.138668.

3. O. Poyraz and B. Ögel, “Recrystallization, grain growth and austenite formation in cold rolled steels during intercritical annealing,” J. Mater. Res. Technol., vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 11263–11277, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.08.015.

4. A. Sardar, C. H. M. Simha, and A. Bardelcik, “Phenomenological model for yield, flow, and failure behavior of dual-phase steels,” Mater. Sci. Eng., A, vol. 798, 2020, Art. no. 140136, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.140136.

5. O. Tuncel and H. Aydin, “A comparison of tensile properties of single-sided and double-sided laser welded DP600 steel sheets,” Medziagotyra, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 173–178, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ms.26.2.21374.