A modal account of syntactically non-integrated von wegen in contemporary German

Author:

Moroni Manuela Caterina1ORCID,Bidese Ermenegildo2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Università degli Studi di Bergamo , Bergamo , Italy

2. Università di Trento , Trento , Italy

Abstract

Abstract This study aims to account for the German expression von wegen (literally ‘of ways’) when used outside of the sentence structure. Drawing on corpus data for written and spoken German, we show that there are two types of syntactically non-integrated von wegen: (i) illustrating/exemplifying von wegen and, (ii) opposing von wegen. By combining both a formal and a functional perspective, we claim that these two types can be analyzed as modal expressions. In fact, from a formal point of view based on Werner Abraham’s classification in lexical and grammatical forms of modality, both illustrating/exemplifying and opposing von wegen encode a quotative/evidential meaning, whereas only the second type expresses an epistemic modal value. Nevertheless, von wegen does not belong to the prototypical forms of modality described by Abraham as it does not occupy a structural position within the sentence and therefore does not fall into any of the classes proposed by Abraham. For this reason, we also need to integrate the formal perspective with a functional one by defining modality not only structurally but also semantically. In doing so, we account for the modality of von wegen in that we assume the existence of a third strategy of modalization that is specific to syntactically non-integrated expressions and operates at the discourse level.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Reference36 articles.

1. Abraham, Werner. 2009. Die Urmasse von Modalität und ihre Ausgliederung: Modalpartikeln anhand von Modalverben, Modalpartikeln und Modus. Was ist das Gemeinsame, was das Trennende, und was steckt dahinter. In Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds.), Modalität: Epistemik und Evidentialität bei Modalverb, Adverb, Modalpartikel und Modus, 251–302. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.

2. Abraham, Werner. 2020. Modality in syntax, semantics and pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

3. Aijmer, Karin. 2016. Modality and mood in functional linguistic approaches. In Jan Nuyts & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and mood, 495–513. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

4. Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2003. Evidentiality in typological perspective. In Alexandra Aikhenvald & Robert M. W. Dixon (eds.), Studies in evidentiality, 1–31. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

5. Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3