Aggression in diplomatic notes – a pragmatic analysis of a Chinese-American conflict in times of colonisation

Author:

House Juliane12,Kádár Dániel Z.32,Liu Fengguang3,Song Yulong3

Affiliation:

1. University of Hamburg, Hamburg , Hamburg , Germany

2. Hungarian Research Centre for Linguistics , Budapest , Hungary

3. Dalian University of Foreign Languages , Dalian , China

Abstract

Abstract This study examines veiled aggression in diplomatic language use from the point of view of speech acts. More specifically, we examine how the speech act of ‘Tell’ is used to realise aggression in a small corpus of diplomatic notes written between February and May 1844, exchanged between a US American and a Chinese diplomat. Tell, by default, presents a ‘neutral’ informative illocution. However, in contexts of diplomatic conflicts, particularly when a threat is made, realising Tell often helps the aggressor to deliver menacing messages under a veneer of civility. Tell is also often intertwined with other speech acts through which aggression is realised, such as Request and Complain. By modelling the aggressive function of Tell in the ritual genre of diplomatic notes, this paper fills a knowledge gap by studying aggression in a setting in which aggression operates within the boundaries of the ritual frame of a diplomatic genre.

Funder

National Research, Development and Innovation Office of Hungary

Momentum Grant of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences

National Science Foundation of China

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Philosophy,Communication,Language and Linguistics,Polymers and Plastics,General Environmental Science

Reference36 articles.

1. Archer, Dawn. 2008. Verbal aggression and impoliteness: Related or synonymous? In Derek Bousfield & Miriam Locher (eds.), Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice, 181–208. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

2. Beres, Louis. 2015. Defending Israel against Iranian nuclear aggression: War, genocide, and international law. Israel Journal of Foreign Affairs 9(2). 179–188.

3. Blum-Kulka, Shohana, Juliane House & Gabriele Kasper (eds.). 1989. Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

4. Bull, Peter. 2013. The role of adversarial discourse in political opposition: Prime Minister’s questions and the British phone-hacking scandal. Language and Dialogue 3(2). 254–272.

5. Chilton, Paul. 1990. Politeness, politics and diplomacy. Discourse and Society 1(2). 201–224.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3