Linguistic complexity of public legal information texts for young persons-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Linguistic complexity of public legal information texts for young persons

Published:2023-01-03 Issue:0 Volume:0 Page:
ISSN:1860-7330
Container-title:Text & Talk
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Mamac Monaliza Hernandez¹^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences , The University of Sydney , Camperdown 2006 , NSW , Australia

Abstract

Abstract The present study explores the linguistic complexity (LC) of public legal information (PLI) texts for young persons by deploying the Hallidayan model of lexical density and grammatical intricacy. It examines how the Australian legal statutes’ grammatical intricacy and lexical density are reformulated into PLI texts to make them more accessible for a specific vulnerable group. The findings reveal that although the PLI texts were claimed to be written in plain language, they trade some types of complexity for others. The paper extends Halliday’s model of complexity by adding lower rank complexes and embedded clause complexes as realisations of intricacy and density. It proposes “embedded intricacy” as a feature of a hybrid of spoken and written language. Furthermore, the study suggests reconsidering how law can be recontextualised for young persons in a more accessible way.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Linguistics and Language,Philosophy,Communication,Language and Linguistics,Polymers and Plastics,General Environmental Science

Link

https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/text-2021-0187/pdf

Reference50 articles.

1. Assy, Rabeea. 2011. Can law speak directly to its subjects? The limitation of plain language. Journal of Law and Society 38(3). 376–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2011.00549.x.

2. Australian Government Style Manual. n.d. The standard for Australian Government writing and editing. https://www.stylemanual.gov.au/ (accessed 12 March 2019).

3. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. 2020. Health and welfare overview. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports-data/health-welfare-overview (accessed 10 December 2020).

4. Bhatia, Vijay K. 2014. Cognitive structuring in legislative provisions. In John Gibbons (ed.), Language and the law, 136–155. Oxon & New York: Routledge.

5. Bhatia, Vijay K. 1984. Syntactic discontinuity in legislative writing and its implications for academic legal purposes. In Anthony K. Pugh & Jan M. Ulijn (eds.), Reading for professional purposes, 90–96. London: Heinemann Educational Books.