Tests for comparison of multiple endpoints with application to omics data

Author:

Marozzi Marco1

Affiliation:

1. University of Venice , Via Torino 155 , 30172 Venezia , Italy

Abstract

Abstract In biomedical research, multiple endpoints are commonly analyzed in “omics” fields like genomics, proteomics and metabolomics. Traditional methods designed for low-dimensional data either perform poorly or are not applicable when analyzing high-dimensional data whose dimension is generally similar to, or even much larger than, the number of subjects. The complex biochemical interplay between hundreds (or thousands) of endpoints is reflected by complex dependence relations. The aim of the paper is to propose tests that are very suitable for analyzing omics data because they do not require the normality assumption, are powerful also for small sample sizes, in the presence of complex dependence relations among endpoints, and when the number of endpoints is much larger than the number of subjects. Unbiasedness and consistency of the tests are proved and their size and power are assessed numerically. It is shown that the proposed approach based on the nonparametric combination of dependent interpoint distance tests is very effective. Applications to genomics and metabolomics are discussed.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Computational Mathematics,Genetics,Molecular Biology,Statistics and Probability

Reference22 articles.

1. Bai, Z. and H. Saranadasa (1996): “Effect of high dimension: by an example of a two sample problem,” Stat. Sinica, 6, 311–329.

2. Brombin, C., E. Midena and L. Salmaso (2013): “Robust non-parametric tests for complex-repeated measures problems in ophthalmology,” Stat. Methods Med. Res., 22, 643–660.

3. Cai, T. T., W. Liu and Y. Xia (2014): “Two-sample test of high dimensional means under dependence,” J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 76, 349–372.

4. Chen, S. X. and Y. L. Qin (2010): “A two-sample test for high-dimensional data with applications to gene-set testing,” Ann. Stat., 38, 808–835.

5. Hajek, J., Z. Sidak and P. K. Sen (1998): Theory of rank tests, 2nd ed., Academic Press, New York.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3