Affiliation:
1. Université Paris 8 , UMR 7114 MoDyCo , Institut Universitaire de France , Saint-Denis , France
Abstract
Abstract
Linguists have debated whether complex prepositions deserve a constituent status, but none have proposed a dynamic model that can both predict what construal a given pattern imposes and account for the emergence of non-spatial readings. This paper reframes the debate on constituency as a justification of the constructional status of complex prepositional patterns from a historical perspective. It focuses on the Prep NP
IL
of NP
lm
construction, which denotes a relation of internal location between a located entity (a trajector) and a reference entity (a landmark). Four subschemas of the Internal Location construction are examined: middle
cxn (in the middle of), center
cxn (in/at the center of), heart
cxn (in/at the heart of), and midst
cxn (in the midst of). All occurrences are extracted from the COHA, along with their co-occurring landmark NPs. Using vocabulary growth curves, all patterns are shown to be productive over the whole period covered by the corpus, although at different levels. Using word2vec, a semantic vector space with the landmark collocates of each pattern is made. Curves indexed on association scores are plotted to see how densely semantic areas have been populated across four consecutive periods: 1810s–1860s, 1870s–1910s, 1920s–1970s, and 1980s–2000s. Two divisions of labor have emerged. midst
cxn and heart
cxn are in complementary distribution and operate mostly at the level of abstract locations whereas middle
cxn and center
cxn are in parallel distribution and operate at the level of concrete locations.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Language and Linguistics
Reference87 articles.
1. Alatrash, Reem, Dominik Schlechtweg, Jonas Kuhn & Sabine Schulte im Walde. 2020. CCOHA: Clean corpus of historical American English. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2020), 6958–6966. https://acianthoiogy.org/2020.lrec-1.859.pdf.
2. Baayen, Rolf Harald. 1989. A corpus-based approach to morphological productivity. Statistical analysis andpsycholinguistic interpretation. Amsterdam: Centrum Wiskunde en Informatica.
3. Baayen, Rolf Harald. 1992. Quantitative aspects of morphological productivity. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1991, 109–149. Dordrecht & London: Kluwer.
4. Baayen, Rolf Harald. 1993. On frequency, transparency and productivity. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1992, 181–208. Dordrecht & London: Kluwer.
5. Baayen, Rolf Harald & Rochelle Lieber. 1991. Productivity and English derivation: A corpus-based study. Linguistics 29. 801–843. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1991.29.5.801.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献