Affiliation:
1. Department of Computer Engineering, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals , Dhahran , Saudi Arabia
2. Department of Mechanical Engineering , Dharmsinh Desai University , Nadiad , Gujarat , India
3. Department of Mechanical Engineering , Bursa Uludag University , Bursa , Türkiye
Abstract
Abstract
Optimization techniques play a pivotal role in enhancing the performance of engineering components across various real-world applications. Traditional optimization methods are often augmented with exploitation-boosting techniques due to their inherent limitations. Recently, nature-inspired algorithms, known as metaheuristics (MHs), have emerged as efficient tools for solving complex optimization problems. However, these algorithms face challenges such as imbalance between exploration and exploitation phases, slow convergence, and local optima. Modifications incorporating oppositional techniques, hybridization, chaotic maps, and levy flights have been introduced to address these issues. This article explores the application of the recently developed crayfish optimization algorithm (COA), assisted by artificial neural networks (ANN), for engineering design optimization. The COA, inspired by crayfish foraging and migration behaviors, incorporates temperature-dependent strategies to balance exploration and exploitation phases. Additionally, ANN augmentation enhances the algorithm’s performance and accuracy. The COA method optimizes various engineering components, including cantilever beams, hydrostatic thrust bearings, three-bar trusses, diaphragm springs, and vehicle suspension systems. Results demonstrate the effectiveness of the COA in achieving superior optimization solutions compared to other algorithms, emphasizing its potential for diverse engineering applications.
Reference47 articles.
1. K.-L. Du and M. N. S. Swamy, Search and Optimization by Metaheuristics, Cham, Springer International Publishing, 2016.
2. B. Chopard and M. Tomassini, “An introduction to metaheuristics for optimization,” in Natural Computing Series, Cham, Springer International Publishing, 2018.
3. P. Singh and S. K. Choudhary, “Introduction: optimization and metaheuristics algorithms,” in Metaheuristic and Evolutionary Computation: Algorithms and Applications, vol. 916, H. Malik, A. Iqbal, P. Joshi, S. Agrawal, and F. I. Bakhsh, Eds., in Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 916, Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2021, pp. 3–33.
4. S. Kumar, et al.., “Chaotic marine predators algorithm for global optimization of real-world engineering problems,” Knowledge-Based Syst., vol. 261, 2023, Art. no. 110192, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2022.110192.
5. D. Gürses, P. Mehta, S. M. Sait, S. Kumar, and A. R. Yildiz, “A multi-strategy boosted prairie dog optimization algorithm for global optimization of heat exchangers,” Mater. Test., vol. 65, no. 9, pp. 1396–1404, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2023-0082.