How to Read the ‘Literary’ in the Literary Market

Author:

Lanzendörfer Tim1

Affiliation:

1. Institute of English and American Studies, Goethe University of Frankfurt , Norbert-Wollheim-Platz 1, 60629 Frankfurt am Main , Germany

Abstract

Abstract This essay argues that under contemporary capitalism, all literary production is, at first approximation, commodity production. This has consequences for our understanding of the work of literary studies. We are no longer able to easily recur to preformed theories of the ‘literary’ as a category at least in some way exempt from extrinsic pressures. Attention to the ‘literary market’ remains superficial when it insists on paying attention chiefly to so-called literary fiction on the understanding that it has prima facie higher claims to our attention than popular genre fiction—it does not. In fact, as this essay argues, appreciation of the thorough commodification of art under capitalism asks us to take seriously the need to break with our categories; to insist on the primacy of interpretative attention in determining what kinds of fiction we study.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

Literature and Literary Theory,Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics

Reference34 articles.

1. Altieri, C. 2009. “Why Modernist Claims to Autonomy Matter.” Journal of Modern Literature 32 (3): 1–21.

2. Balibar, E., and P. Macherey. 1996 [1974]. “On Literature as Ideological Form.” In Marxist Literary Theory: A Reader, edited by T. Eagleton, and D. Milne, 275–95. Oxford: Blackwell.

3. Barry, P. 2013. English in Practice: In Pursuit of English Studies. London: Bloomsbury.

4. Barth, J. 1984. “The Literature of Replenishment.” In The Friday Book: Essays and Other Non-Fiction, 193–206. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

5. Bloom, C. 2008. Bestseller: Popular Fiction since 1900. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The Short Story, the New Weird, and the Literary Market;Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik;2020-06-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3