Angry about Fraud: How Congress Took up Trump’s Claims of Fraud

Author:

Brown Heath1,Cormack Lindsey2

Affiliation:

1. Associate Professor, City University of New York, Grad Center and John Jay College , New York , NY , USA

2. Assistant Professor, Stevens Institute of Technology , Hoboken , NJ , USA

Abstract

Abstract Talk of fraud dominated President Donald J. Trump’s campaign and time in office. In this article, we explore whether members of Congress followed Trump’s lead in discussing all types of fraud, including electoral fraud as well as fraud, waste, and abuse. Using a unique dataset of the universe of congressional electronic newsletters from 2010 to 2021, we show that Republicans wrote to constituents about fraud much more than Democrats, especially about electoral fraud after Trump’s election, but it was Democrats who used angrier rhetoric to discuss fraud, a check on the President and many of the false claims about voter fraud in 2016 and 2020. These findings show an important aspect of the inter-party and inter-branch dynamics at play during Trump’s presidency; once keen to focus on fraud, waste and abuse in government congressional Republican attention shifted once the head of the executive branch was a co-partisan to parroting the claims of electoral and voter fraud made by the President.

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

Subject

General Social Sciences,Sociology and Political Science

Reference42 articles.

1. Ansolabehere, S., and N. Persily. 2008. “Voter Fraud in the Eye of the Beholder.” Harvard Law Review 121: 1737–74.

2. Berry, J., and S. Sobieraj. 2014. The Outrage Industry: Political Opinion Media and the New Incivility. New York: Oxford University Press.

3. Blum, R. M. 2020. How the Tea Party Captured the GOP: Insurgent Factions in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

4. Brown, H. 2020. “Undermining the Social Welfare State through Investigating Fraud, Waste, and Abuse.” In Presented at 2020 PAR Symposium September 25.

5. Brown, H. 2021. “Does Congress Still Care about Fraud, Waste, and Abuse: Yes, A Descriptive Analysis of Bills and Hearings, 1993–2016.” Public Integrity 23 (2): 181–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2020.1820700.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3