Author:
Basso Adriano,Crocioni Pietro
Abstract
AbstractThe UK Government has proposed national roaming to ensure that consumers may use rival networks in areas where their own operator does not offer (network) coverage (these are known as partial not-spots). The proposed policy aimed at increasing the likelihood of callers being able to make and receive calls. While this may raise a number of concerns in terms of possible harm to consumers, this article only focuses on one question: whether national roaming, rather than making it more likely that consumers in partial not-spots may be able make and receive calls, may achieve the very opposite outcome. This is because, under national roaming, and depending on the level of the charge, operators may have the incentive to withdraw their network coverage and roam instead. We also analyse the implications for dual coverage areas.
Subject
Economics and Econometrics
Reference13 articles.
1. Is Mobile Telephony a Natural Oligopoly ?;Valletti;Review of Industrial Organization,2003
2. Why is On - Net Traffic Cheaper Than Off - Net Traffic ? Access Mark - up as a Collusive Device;Gabrielsen;European Economic Review,2008
3. Using the Economics of the Pass Through in Proving Antitrust Injury in Robinson - Patman Cases;Alexandrov;Antitrust Bulletin,2015
4. Demand - Side Spillovers and Semi - Collusion in the Mobile Communications Market of Industry Competition and Trade;Foros;Journal,2002
5. Automated Teller Machine Network Pricing - A Review of the Literature of Network Economics;McAndrews;Review,2003
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献