On the design of unconventional testing machines for engineering testing – the case study of advanced joining processes unit
Author:
Tenreiro António Francisco G.1ORCID, Carbas Ricardo J. C.12ORCID, Marques Eduardo A. S.12ORCID, da Silva Carlos M.2, Lopes António M.2, da Silva Lucas F. M.12ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Instituto de Ciência e Inovação em Engenharia Mecânica e Engenharia Industrial (INEGI) , Porto , Portugal 2. Departamento de Engenharia Mecânica, Faculdade de Engenharia (FEUP) , Universidade do Porto , Porto , Portugal
Abstract
Abstract
Structural adhesive joining has become a widely used joining method for various types of structures, thus avoiding more conventional joining methods. In this manner, adhesive materials may be present in structures which suffer loading conditions that may not be normally considered in the design phase, such as high-strain rate conditions or creep and torsional loading. In these situations, adhesive properties and mechanical behaviour are sometimes not well understood, thus requiring special machine testing setups that can only be built for the specific application. Therefore, this paper provides a brief overview of proposed machine architectures for a torsion testing apparatus, a tensile & compressive Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB), a drop-weight apparatus and a three station creep testing machine with a climactic chamber. Each testing apparatus has been designed by graduate students during their master thesis projects, and facilitated in the production of interesting and relevant scientific output in the field of structural adhesive behaviour.
Funder
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Publisher
Walter de Gruyter GmbH
Reference102 articles.
1. G. Keller, Academic Strategy: The Management Revolution in American Higher Education, 1st ed. Oxford, England, United Kingdom, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1983. 2. E. A. S. Marques, R. J. C. Carbas, and L. F. M. da Silva, “Characterizing academic engineering research groups: a case study of the advanced joining processes unit,” U. Porto J. Eng., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 76–89, 2022. https://doi.org/10.24840/2183-6493_008.006_0006. 3. L. F. M. da Silva, A. Öchsner, and R. D. Adams, Handbook of Adhesion Technology, 2nd ed. New York, NY, United States, Springer International Publishing AG, 2018. 4. J. Antelo, A. Akhavan-Safar, R. Carbas, E. Marques, R. Goyal, and L. da Silva, “Replacing welding with adhesive bonding: an industrial case study,” Int. J. Adhes. Adhes., vol. 113, p. 103064, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.103064. 5. F. Delzendehrooy, et al.., “A comprehensive review on structural joining techniques in the marine industry,” Compos. Struct., vol. 289, p. 115490, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115490.
|
|