Affiliation:
1. IUPUI Dept. of Philosophy Cavanaugh Hall 331, 425 University Blvd Indianapolis, Oeting USA
Abstract
Abstract
In this article, I explicate Kant’s position on the wide right to abortion. That is, I explore the extent to which, according to Kant’s practical philosophy, abortion is punishable, even if it involves an unjust infringement of the right to life. By focusing on the state’s right to punish, rather than the right to life or the onset of personhood, I use Kant to expose a novel range of issues and questions about the legal status of abortion (and criminal punishment more generally). The article is divided into four sections. In the first, I lay the groundwork for Kant’s theory of rights and briefly canvass some of the literature on Kantian approaches to abortion. In the second, I look at Kant’s discussion of equivocal rights. In the third, I turn to Kant’s discussions of capital punishment and suicide. In the fourth, I examine Kant on honor killings, and I use his position on infanticide in order to extrapolate and explain his ideas about the right to punish in the context of abortion.
Reference42 articles.
1. Baier, Annette (1993). “Moralism and Cruelty.” Ethics 103, 436–457.
2. Brassington, Iain (2006). “Killing people.” Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (10), 571–574. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2005.015420.
3. Branum, Amy, Ahrens, Katherine (2017). “Trends in Timing of Pregnancy Awareness Among US Women.” Maternal Child Health Journal 21, 715–726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-016-2155-1
4. Brandt, Reinhard (1999). “Kants Forderung der Todesstrafe bei Duell- und Kindesmord.” In: Das Recht der Republik. Hrsg. von Hauke Brunkhorst, Peter Niesen. Frankfurt a.M., 268–287.
5. Brandt, Reinhard (2004). “Kants Ehe- und Kindesrecht.” Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 52 (2), 199–220.