Affiliation:
1. Department of History , Tel Aviv University , P.O. Box 39040 , Tel Aviv , Israel
2. Département d’Histoire , Université de Rennes 2 , Place du Recteur Henri Le Moal , Rennes , France
Abstract
AbstractWhen we compare the genealogical strategies of the Ptolemies, Seleukids, and Hasmoneans, those of the Ptolemies and the Hasmoneans display striking parallels, while the Seleukids followed a different policy. This article explores one facet of the parallels, the combined use of funerary monuments, festivals, and narratives (mythical and historical) to create prestigious dynastic ancestors. We commence with Alexander the Great and Nectanebo II, the last native king to rule before the Persian conquest of Egypt, who became putative ancestors of the Ptolemies by way of Alexander’s Sema in Alexandria, the Ptolemaic ruler cult, and four texts—theDemotic Chronicle,Nectanebo’s Dreamand its “sequel”, and theAlexander Romance. The comparison between the Ptolemies and the Hasmoneans focuses on Alexander’s Sema and the Hasmonean funerary monument erected by Simon in Modi’in. Alongside their physical similarities, we show how the Modi’in monument was instrumental in turning the Hasmonean John Hyrkanos into the heir of all the tomb dwellers, particularly Judas Maccabee.
Reference78 articles.
1. Almagor, E. “Seleukid love and power: Stratonike I.” In Coşkun and McAuley 2016, 67–86.
2. Alonso, T. “Some remarks on the funeral of the kings: from Philipp II to the Diadochi.” In Alexander and his Successors, edited by P. Wheatley and R. Hannah, 276–98. Claremont: Regina, 2009.
3. Assmann, J. Das Kulturelle Gedächtnis. Munich: C. H. Beck, 1992.
4. Anson, E. “Ptolemy and the Destruction of the First Regency.” In Ptolemy I, edited by T. Howe, 20–35. Oxford: Oxbow, 2018.
5. Assmann, J. Das Kulturelle Gedächtnis. Munich: C. H. Beck, 1992.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献